Los administradores de TransicionEstructural no se responsabilizan de las opiniones vertidas por los usuarios del foro. Cada usuario asume la responsabilidad de los comentarios publicados.
0 Usuarios y 4 Visitantes están viendo este tema.
Cita de: Manu Oquendo en Agosto 02, 2021, 13:48:31 pmAndando el tiempo creo que se ha hecho evidente que aquella fue una mala "decisión" -- o si se quiere una "obligación" estratégica-- y que nos hubiera ido mejor siguiendo la que hoy podríamos llamar la "opción Coreana" que en mi propuesta de entonces llamé la "vía Japonesa" porque entonces Corea era como España. Dos países muy homogéneos industrial y económicamente. Esta opción se centraba en la industrialización para un mercado global con una estrecha alianza con los EEUU --sin intermediarios en Bruselas--, moneda propia e integración directa en las instituciones imperiales (OTAN, etc.) Creo que esta opción pudo estar sobre la mesa con los EEUU pero no estábamos internamente unidos para un frente común.Quiero recordar que USA fue el último país con el que España estuvo en guerra y donde ellos se quedaron con Cuba, Puerto Rico y Filipinas como botín tras vencer. Esa guerra cambió a España, de ser una potencia ultramarina a un país de la periferia europea.No entiendo como puede haber gente en este país, especialmente en la derecha, que vean a los anglosajones como defensores de nuestros intereses. Debe ser algún síndrome de Estocolmo. Tampoco no descarto que los americanos e ingleses instalaron a sus dobleagentes dentro de los partidos de la derecha, viendo la anglofilia que tienen PP y Vox.Los de la pulserita rojigualda como defenderos de los intereses de los que nos derrotaron en guerras…en fin.
Andando el tiempo creo que se ha hecho evidente que aquella fue una mala "decisión" -- o si se quiere una "obligación" estratégica-- y que nos hubiera ido mejor siguiendo la que hoy podríamos llamar la "opción Coreana" que en mi propuesta de entonces llamé la "vía Japonesa" porque entonces Corea era como España. Dos países muy homogéneos industrial y económicamente. Esta opción se centraba en la industrialización para un mercado global con una estrecha alianza con los EEUU --sin intermediarios en Bruselas--, moneda propia e integración directa en las instituciones imperiales (OTAN, etc.) Creo que esta opción pudo estar sobre la mesa con los EEUU pero no estábamos internamente unidos para un frente común.
The Federal Reserve's quantitative easing (QE) program inevitably affects the stock market, though it is difficult to know exactly how and to what extent. The evidence suggests that there is a positive correlation between a QE policy and a rising stock market. In fact, some of the largest stock market gains in U.S. history have occurred while a QE policy was underway.After all, the purpose of a QE policy is to support or even jumpstart a nation's economic activity. In practice, QE policy entails buying massive amounts of government bonds or other investments from banks in order to inject more cash into the system. That cash is then loaned by the banks to businesses, which spend it to expand their operations and increase their sales. Stock investors anticipate the increased company revenue and buy the stocks.That's the big picture, but there are other, more subtle, effects of a QE policy on stock prices.
Yo continuo escéptico al respecto, dudo de que no exista una correlación entre los QE y la Bolsa & Inmuebles. Y si no existe de forma directa, al menos, existe de forma indirecta.Precisamente muchos economistas están de acuerdo en que las políticas económicas actuales no solo fomentan las burbujas, sino que las alimentan directamente. Tales economistas son Sven Henrich (mencionado en este foro) o Hans-Werner Sinn.Saludos.
Entiendo de ahí que el dinero que infla la bolsa no viene de las precarias rentas salariales, ni del pueblo que está pasando penurias.
Quería también decir, acerca de la inflación, que cuando leo a Asustadísimos hablar de que no habrá inflación entiendo que se refiere a que no va a haber problemas de subidas de precio de los bienes y servicios, dado que el poder de compra de los consumidores (Estados en su faceta de consumidor, familias y empresas) está tremendamente mermado por la elefantiásica deuda contraída en estos últimos años, y por lo tanto en este contexto nadie tiene margen para gastar, salvo que sea a crédito, y entendemos que si no estamos al límite de crédito, estamos cerca. Si la vivienda bajara de golpe un 30%, se podría liberar esa parte de la renta de las familias para aumentar el consumo, el ahorro y el repago de deuda, pero pienso que en ese caso también los sueldos y las partidas presupuestarias bajarían hasta que todo llegara a un punto de equilibrio.
GameStop Corp. and future standalone company Victoria’s Secret are among the additions to the S&P 400 Midcap Index, index provider S&P Dow Jones Indices said late Tuesday.GameStop GME, -3.11%, a videogame retailer that became one of the most recognizable names among the “meme stocks,” will replace Weingarten Realty Investors WRI, -2.06% in the midcap index, with Lakeland Financial Corp. LKFN, -0.18% replacing GameStop in the S&P SmallCap 600 SML, +0.77%.The changes are effective Aug. 4, S&P Dow Jones Indices said in a statement. Kimco Realty Corp. KIM, -2.40%, an S&P 500 index constituent, is buying Weingarten Realty in a deal expected to close on or about that date, it said. [...]
P. Y como empresario, ¿se gusta?P. No tengo propiedades inmobiliarias, no he invertido en la Bolsa, no he hecho nada con mi dinero que no sea apoyar ideas de gente cercana que creo que pueden ir para delante, así que de momento no hay queja.
más no-inflación
Update: Framing Lumber Prices Down Year-over-year(...) Lumber price are down 6% year-over-year.There were supply constraints over the last year, for example, sawmills cut production and inventory at the beginning of the pandemic, and the West Coast fires in 2020 damaged privately-owned timberland. The supply constraints have eased somewhat.And there was a huge surge in demand for lumber (demand remains strong).
We should not be too sanguine about a shrinking populationFalling birth rates are good news for the planet but they are also a symptom of generational inequalityWhen my mother was born, there were fewer than 3bn people in the world. When I was born, there were almost 5bn, and when I gave birth to my daughter, there were 7.7bn. She may live to see the beginning of a new era: the point at which the number of people on the planet begins to decline.The pandemic has caused a baby bust of historic proportions in some countries. In Spain, 20 per cent fewer babies were born in December 2020 than in the same month a year earlier, the lowest number since 1941, when such records began. Births fell 22 per cent in Italy and 13 per cent in France.There isn’t a dearth of babies everywhere (some countries, such as Germany, have experienced a mini boom) and the pandemic’s impact on procreation may prove fleeting. But it has focused attention on the long-term decline in the number of babies women are having more or less everywhere.Almost half the global population now lives in a country or area where the lifetime fertility rate (the average number of babies per woman) sits below the “replacement rate” of 2.1 — the number that would keep the population stable. Even in sub-Saharan Africa, where the population is still growing fast, the fertility rate has declined from 6.8 in the 1970s to about 4.6. The latest UN World Population Prospects report from 2019 predicts global population growth will level off by roughly 2100, while a paper published by researchers in The Lancet last year forecasts that the number of people in the world will peak in 2064 at 9.7bn and decline to 8.8bn by 2100.Many will see this as good news for the planet. Rapid population growth has helped to put the environment under extreme stress. And in developing countries, declining fertility rates are usually connected to women gaining more education and opportunities.Meanwhile, countries that struggle with how to pay for and look after their ageing populations in the coming decades could allow more immigration from places that are still growing. The Lancet paper predicts that Nigeria will be the second most populous country by 2100, after India. “There are so many people all over the globe who are dying to come to Europe and the US — we could just let them in,” says Joshua Wilde, a research fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.In any case, we might not be able to return fertility rates to replacement levels in rich countries even if we wanted to. Finland has a number of policies that help parents combine work with children, yet its fertility rate remains well below this level. “We made a study of parents with kids below 16, how they combined work and family life, and our biggest problem was to make an interesting report because they were all so satisfied,” says Anna Rotkirch, a research professor at Finland’s Population Research Institute. “There was hope that true gender equality would raise fertility levels, but . . . if we have this mode of two careers, dual earners, maybe the average fertility rate will be around 1.5,” she adds. “Is that then a bad thing in itself if people are happy?”That said, we shouldn’t celebrate declining fertility rates regardless of the cause. In some countries, people are having fewer babies than they say they want. In South Korea, where the fertility rate is now below 1, the working hours are too long, housing and education are too expensive and mothers too unsupported. Erin Hye-Won Kim, assistant professor at the University of Seoul, says the same system that powered the economy’s rapid development has put society under stress: “Working long and working late became virtuous.”A stressed generation is not something to welcome, and it is not unique to South Korea, though it is particularly acute there. When the Financial Times surveyed young people around the world earlier this year, many spoke of a deep sense of insecurity that spanned unstable work and housing to the fear they would never be able to retire. Some said they didn’t feel secure enough to have children.The risk is that, as countries begin to age and shrink, these dynamics enter a vicious circle, especially if young people see policy shaped increasingly around the needs of the more populous older generations.In Japan, where the population started to decline in 2011, panel surveys by Hiroshi Ishida, a professor at Tokyo university’s Institute of Social Science, show young people are satisfied with their current living standards but are “much more grim” about the future. Sachiko Horiguchi, an associate professor at Temple University’s Japan campus, says: “They know they don’t have much voice over politics — the older people have a lot of votes, they mobilise in politics, all the money is going to that generation.” One of the defining policy challenges of the next 100 years will be to meet the needs of ageing populations while ensuring there is still hope and security for the young.We can’t control the number of babies women have, nor should we want to. But in many ways, having a child is an act of faith in the future. If some people are not having the babies they say they want, it is a warning sign we should heed, not something to shrug off because there are too many humans on the planet anyway.
Housing price boom ‘losing steam’, values climb at slower rate as affordability crisis deepensResidential property prices continue to climb but the pace has slowed as more and more Australians simply can’t afford a roof over their head.
Yellen says monthly U.S. inflation rates should subside by end-2021ATLANTA, Aug 4 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Wednesday she anticipates that monthly inflation rates will subside by the end of 2021, even as year-over-year inflation readings stay elevated due to lingering comparison effects from the coronavirus pandemic.Yellen, speaking to reporters after a tour of a social services agency in Atlanta, repeated her view that currently high inflation is a transitory effect from supply bottlenecks and shifts in spending demand caused by the pandemic and recovery.“Even if monthly (inflation) rates come down, we’ll see somewhat elevated year-over-year rates for some time. But my expectation is that by the end of the year, that monthly rates will come down to a pace consistent with the Fed’s interpretation of price stability,” Yellen said.