Los administradores de TransicionEstructural no se responsabilizan de las opiniones vertidas por los usuarios del foro. Cada usuario asume la responsabilidad de los comentarios publicados.
0 Usuarios y 5 Visitantes están viendo este tema.
Renta 4, tokenización de inmueblesLa Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) ha saldado con una opinión favorable la evaluación previa de OpenBrick para su admisión en el espacio controlado de pruebas (sandbox), junto a cuatro otros proyectos. Esta sociedad está centrada en la tokenización de activos inmobiliarios.De este modo, la propuesta conjunta de Renta 4 Banco, Grupo Lar e ioBuilders será supervisada por la CNMV en un sector cada vez más en auge. Según CBRE, solo en España se invirtieron más de 17.000 millones de euros en 2022.El objetivo de OpenBrick será desarrollar un mercado de instrumentos financieros tokenizados vinculados a los proyectos inmobiliarios. La tokenización consiste en la representación digital de un activo financiero en una red de blockchain.Esta tecnología permite que la emisión y la compraventa de los activos financieros se realicen de manera más eficiente, rápidas, accesibles y transparentes para todas las partes. La innovación desde un punto de vista financiero consiste en vincular los eventos económicos de instrumentos financieros tradicionales tales como acciones y bonos con las rentas generadas por los proyectos inmobiliarios (alquileres y plusvalías).Grupo Lar será el emisor del primer proyecto, para ir dando entrada posteriormente a otros emisores. Los instrumentos financieros (bonos, acciones…) vinculados a activos inmobiliarios (viviendas, locales comerciales, oficinas) se representarán en la red de blockchain desarrollada con la tecnología de ioBuilders.Por su parte, Renta 4 Banco actuará como operador del mercado e intermediario para sus clientes. Esto permitirá comprar y vender estos activos de forma similar a la Bolsa. La plataforma constituye así un canal de financiación no bancaria, donde los promotores inmobiliarios podrán captar fondos para impulsar sus proyectos de una manera más ágil y a un coste más reducido que a través de las vías de financiación tradicionales.Para el inversor, OpenBrick representa una oportunidad en el sector inmobiliario sin precedente en España, facilitando que sea el propio inversor el que configure una cartera de activos concretos que sean de su interés y que vendrán representados por tokens de importes accesibles para cualquier tipología de cliente. Además, al disponer de un mercado secundario de compraventa de tokens, la plataforma permitirá dotar de cierta liquidez a estas inversiones, permitiendo a los tenedores intercambiarlas a través de su mercado secundario.https://www.capitalmadrid.com/2023/2/17/64472/renta-4-tokenizacion-de-inmuebles.html
https://www.eleconomista.es/retail-consumo/noticias/12154483/02/23/El-precio-de-la-leche-en-origen-crece-un-64-y-supera-ya-la-media-europea.htmlSaludos.
https://www.campogalego.es/menos-vacas-pero-mas-productivas-la-tendencia-en-la-mayoria-de-paises-de-la-ue-tras-el-final-de-las-cuotas/15/05/2020Menos vacas pero más productivas: la tendencia en la mayoría de países de la UE tras el final de las cuotasExcepto Irlanda y Polonia, donde el número de animales está creciendo, el resto de productores reducen cabaña ganadera. En España, el descenso ha sido de un 3,8% desde el 2015, pasando de 844.000 vacas a 812.000, pero cada animal da casi un 8% más de leche que hace 5 años
['Pisiketty' no es el inspirador de la hipotética pisitofobia. Todo lo contrario. Es el adalid falsorrojo de la consideración del pisito como capital y del olvido de la deuda. Precisamente, el predicamento que tuvo fue porque defendía las tesis falsoliberales —popularcapitalistas— desde un presunto rojerío.]
Ningún funcionario quiso firmar el documento que hubiera desbloqueado la fabricación de los convoyes por miedo a enfrentarse a responsabilidades penales como las del accidente de Angrois
Mom Refuses To Let 25-Year-Old Daughter Move In After Her Rent Increased By 40% Because She Needs To 'Take Care Of Herself'the rent in the area they live in has increased, and her daughter's landlord recently raised her rent by more than 40% in the span of three months.......Now, she and her boyfriend are unable to continue living in their apartment....Their daughter even offered to pay rent while she lived with them, but their only condition to accept was if she "agreed to pay the market average plus her share of utilities."If their daughter was forced to pay that amount, it would mean she wouldn't be able to save up the amount of money she needs to move back out with her boyfriend.Since they are not letting their daughter move back in, she is now being forced to share a two-bedroom apartment with six roommates, some of whom she says are "sketchy.""I feel for her, but I still think it's her responsibility. At this point, she doesn't call much anymore and I'm worried this may have impacted our relationship."
15 million renters pay more for housing than they can afford. Here’s how to figure out if you’re one of them*With rents at historic highs, deciding what you should spend on housing is an increasingly difficult task.*Housing experts have some strategies to figure it out.There’s often a chasm between theory and practice, what we should do and what we actually do. Yet, when it comes to the long-held advice for renters to not spend more than 30% of their income on housing, the target is increasingly impossible to even try to reach, experts say.“The old 30% guideline is just unrealistic these days,” said Marc Hummel, a licensed real estate salesperson at Douglas Elliman in New York.More often, Hummel said, tenants spend 40% of their income, or more, on housing. “With vacancy rates at record lows and rents near some of the highest on record, it’s become increasingly more difficult to spend less,” he said.Indeed, nearly 15 million renter households in the U.S. are considered cost-burdened, meaning they’re spending more than 30% of their income on rent and utilities. In some cities, the situation is especially dire. For example, in New York, a household with the area’s median income would need to pay nearly 69% of their earnings to rent the average-priced apartment, according to Moody’s Analytics.There are major consequences to taking on a rent that eats up too much of your income, Hummel said. “Spending more on rent means less money for savings, retirement, family goals and less to pay for other debt obligations,” he said.Housing is the single biggest financial area where people get trapped, according to personal finance blogger and author Ramit Sethi. “Which is why it’s so important to follow some general guidelines when you’re deciding how much you can afford,” said Sethi, who wrote “I Will Teach You To Be Rich.”‘A week’s pay for a month’s rent’Renters used to be advised to spend even less than 30% on housing, said Andrew Aurand, senior vice president of research at the National Low Income Housing Coalition. In 1969, the Housing and Urban Development Act required public housing residents to contribute just 25% of their earnings toward rent, Aurand said.“That percentage stemmed from the Depression of the 1930s, when a common rule of thumb was ‘a week’s pay for a month’s rent,’” he said.In practice, there are a variety of factors that should determine what’s the right share for a household to spend on their housing, Aurand said. For example, a married couple without children may be able to spend more on their rent than another married couple with the same income that does have kids.One simple way to measure if your housing costs are affordable, Aurand said, is to calculate how much of your income is left over to cover your other bills once your rent is paid.“After paying for their housing, does the household have adequate income to pay for their non-housing expenses?” he said. “If not, they are considered cost-burdened.”30% not a hard and fast ruleRenters shouldn’t look at the 30% guideline as a hard and fast rule, said Allia Mohamed, co-founder and CEO of Openigloo, which allows renters to review buildings and landlords across the U.S.“Every renter is different,” Mohamed said.High-income renters, for instance, should often spend below that threshold, she said. “Just because you make $300,000 a year doesn’t mean you should rent an apartment for $7,500 just because you can,” she said.Meanwhile, a lower-income tenant may be able to direct more than 30% of their income to housing if they don’t have other large recurring expenses, such as loan payments, Mohamed said.She advises renters to create a detailed budget of their monthly expenses, but to also include what they’d like to be setting aside for savings and/or investments. This can help them determine how much is left over for housing costs.‘We can’t throw our hands up’Too many people, especially in expensive cities, decide that finding an affordable rent is unrealistic and then end up spending way too much, Sethi said.“We can’t throw our hands up at the biggest expense of all,” he said. “We have to develop a real strategy for handling it.”Ideally, Sethi said, people should aim to spend no more than 28% of their gross income on their rent costs. (These include, he added, utilities, furniture, repairs, etc.)“If you have no debt, you can stretch the number a bit,” he said. In certain expensive cities, Sethi added, “they might spend 30%, 32%, even 35%.”However, he cautioned, “above that, you’re exposing yourself to serious risk” in the event you lose your job or experience another setback.
https://www.yourtango.com/entertainment/mom-refuses-let-25-year-old-daughter-move-in-landlord-raised-rentCitarMom Refuses To Let 25-Year-Old Daughter Move In After Her Rent Increased By 40% Because She Needs To 'Take Care Of Herself'the rent in the area they live in has increased, and her daughter's landlord recently raised her rent by more than 40% in the span of three months.......Now, she and her boyfriend are unable to continue living in their apartment....Their daughter even offered to pay rent while she lived with them, but their only condition to accept was if she "agreed to pay the market average plus her share of utilities."If their daughter was forced to pay that amount, it would mean she wouldn't be able to save up the amount of money she needs to move back out with her boyfriend.Since they are not letting their daughter move back in, she is now being forced to share a two-bedroom apartment with six roommates, some of whom she says are "sketchy.""I feel for her, but I still think it's her responsibility. At this point, she doesn't call much anymore and I'm worried this may have impacted our relationship."Suena familiar.
Most Reddit users who commented on the woman's post agreed that she was in the wrong."Your daughter is an adult, but she's still your daughter? She's not relying on handouts. She's offered to pay rent," one user wrote."You're really gonna charge her the market average to live at home? She even gave you a timeline. I think you're being unreasonable."Another user added, "You think you're teaching her a life lesson. What you're actually doing is abandoning your child and exposing her to harm."
Finalmente, todos tenemos un sexto sentido acerca del valor de las cosas de la vida —lo mejor es gratis—.]
Co-op cuts best before dates from 150 fruit and veg productsThe Co-op is to remove best before dates from many fruit and vegetables in a bid to reduce food waste.The company said taking the dates off its fresh produce would help shoppers save money and help the environment.It said food stored in the fridge would keep for much longer than best before dates indicated.Bigger national supermarkets, including Sainsbury's and Asda, made similar moves last year.From next week, the Co-op will remove best before dates from more than 150 fresh products, including apples, broccoli, carrots, onions, oranges, potatoes and tomatoes.A small number of more perishable products will still have best before dates.The move follows a trial last year on 20 products.(...)