Los administradores de TransicionEstructural no se responsabilizan de las opiniones vertidas por los usuarios del foro. Cada usuario asume la responsabilidad de los comentarios publicados.
0 Usuarios y 26 Visitantes están viendo este tema.
El artefacto tiene lugar en dos planos diferentes.Por una parte es el ahorro del pobre (manolo y maruja, apuntalados por el gobierno), y por otro es la reserva de grasa del sistema, los fondos y sus centros comerciales, edificios de oficinas, rascacielos, etc.Los primeros darán por culo hasta morir, los otros ya están derivando los excesos a la maquinaria de guerra.
Y siguen en sus trece de no aceptar la realidad. Que se puede hacer con esta gente? Lean sus "argumentos" y díganme si esto no es chulería y negación de la realidsdhttps://www.eldebate.com/economia/20240105/expertos-contradicen-bruselas-aseguran-vivienda-espana-no-esta-sobrevalorada_164649.html
La razon de ser del articulo es el titular, que es el meme que va directo al cerebro del lector; y si el lector es un pisitos, le produce tal dosis extra de dopamina, que ayuda a que el meme pase a formar parte de sus estructuras cerebrales y despues le veamos por todas las conversaciones de cuñaos dando clases magistrales a su aburrida audiencia sobre la ley-de-la-oferta-y-la-demands y resto de hijoputeces varias que El Propietariado utiliza para callar la boca a la disidencia.
No se aprende, no...https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-05/apollo-s-athene-among-insurers-ramping-up-private-equity-lendingCitarPrivate Equity Funds Are Borrowing Against Themselves, With the Help of InsurersAthene backs NAV loans to Vista Equity and Tiger Global fundsPrivate equity demand for NAV loans jumps amid sour IPO marketApollo Global Management Inc. is at the forefront of a growing trend: insurers lending to private equity funds that want to borrow against their investments.Athene, an Apollo unit, is one of several insurers ramping up their participation in net asset value financing, an increasingly popular form of borrowing for private equity funds that need liquidity amid a tough market for cashing out holdings.Demand for these loans is climbing just as US regulators seek to impose higher capital requirements on the largest banks, leading some to be more selective in providing the debt. Enter insurance companies, which have different capital rules than banks and a thirst for high-yielding, long-term assets.About 20 insurers are investing in NAV loans to private funds, including Pacific Life, Allianz Life and Protective Life, according to regulatory documents and people who work in the industry. In December, investment manager AllianceBernstein LP launched AB NAV Lending with an anchor investment from insurance firm Equitable Holdings Inc. Athene is perhaps the most high-profile insurer to enter the market, gaining prominence after acquiring large portions of NAV loans that its parent Apollo arranged and syndicated for Masayoshi Son’s SoftBank Group Corp. and Chase Coleman’s Tiger Global Management. Athene’s firepower has given Apollo the ability to lead bigger loans, like the $1 billion NAV loan Warburg Pincus took out in December to pay down bank facilities involving an older fund. “These types of financings are very attractive to insurers,” said Leah Edelboim, a partner in the fund finance practice at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. “We are seeing more and more insurance providers either leading deals or coming into syndications.”Athene, created in part to help Apollo tap into the billions of dollars that baby boomers and other retirees are putting into annuities, will often acquire a chunk of each NAV loan that Apollo writes. The insurer invested roughly $767 million in NAV loans made to Tiger Global’s venture capital funds during the past two years, the filings show. And in March, Athene acquired a $93 million interest in a five-year NAV loan that Goldman Sachs Group Inc. put together for Vista Equity Partners Fund VII.Representatives for Apollo and Tiger Global declined to comment. A Goldman representative didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment.Rate-fueled BoomNAV loans were once a little-known niche within the fund finance world, where smaller private equity funds obtained loans by pledging their investments in closely held companies as collateral. The financing was only available from private credit firms such as Hark Capital and 17Capital or from a few global banks including Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase & Co.The NAV loan market began to draw more attention during the pandemic, when private equity firms turned to them for cash to tide over the companies they owned until the economy recovered. But it really took off as interest rates jumped and the IPO market floundered in 2022, shutting off traditional sources of liquidity for private equity funds. Now firms are using them to invest more in their portfolio companies, make additional acquisitions or — in a more controversial use of late — pay out distributions to investors.“Higher interest rates are making the exit markets very difficult for private equity sponsors,” said Doug Cruikshank, the founder of New York-based Hark Capital. “They need NAV loans more than ever as a bridge between the companies they have now and when they can sell them.”Even blue-chip firms are turning to NAV loans. Blackstone Inc. late last year said in regulatory filings that some of its funds “have entered into or are expected to enter into” NAV credit facilities, as well as subscription credit lines, a more common form of fund financing.MassMutual was an early entrant to the market among insurers. It established a direct private investments team in 2017 that provides proprietary secured loans backed by a range of assets to private capital managers and funds, a person familiar with the company said. MassMutual didn’t return calls or emails seeking comment.SoftBank DealApollo’s first big financing was a $4 billion NAV loan of sorts in December 2021 for SoftBank, secured by the $40 billion technology venture fund SoftBank Vision Fund 2. Following the SoftBank deal, Athene provided financing to other funds, including those run by Apollo as well as other money managers, regulatory filings show.Larger managers such as Blackstone have bigger funds, and that means they need bigger loans. Some NAV financings are approaching $2 billion and thus need multiple lenders.“No one can hold a loan for $1 billion to $2 billion” on their own, said Pierre-Antoine de Selancy, a co-founder and managing partner at London-based 17Capital.Apollo, like bank lenders in the NAV sector, typically limits the size of its loans to no more than 10% of the assets pledged as collateral. This not only protects against losses, but also helps the NAV loans obtain investment-grade credit ratings, a vital step for banks to syndicate the debt to insurers.The influx of insurer capital is prompting lenders to get credit ratings for NAV loans they plan to syndicate. The credit ratings not only give insurers insight into the riskiness of a NAV loan but also reduce the amount of regulatory capital they must set aside for the debt, said Gopal Narsimhamurthy, head of the fund ratings group at KBRA, the largest rater of NAV loans.
Private Equity Funds Are Borrowing Against Themselves, With the Help of InsurersAthene backs NAV loans to Vista Equity and Tiger Global fundsPrivate equity demand for NAV loans jumps amid sour IPO marketApollo Global Management Inc. is at the forefront of a growing trend: insurers lending to private equity funds that want to borrow against their investments.Athene, an Apollo unit, is one of several insurers ramping up their participation in net asset value financing, an increasingly popular form of borrowing for private equity funds that need liquidity amid a tough market for cashing out holdings.Demand for these loans is climbing just as US regulators seek to impose higher capital requirements on the largest banks, leading some to be more selective in providing the debt. Enter insurance companies, which have different capital rules than banks and a thirst for high-yielding, long-term assets.About 20 insurers are investing in NAV loans to private funds, including Pacific Life, Allianz Life and Protective Life, according to regulatory documents and people who work in the industry. In December, investment manager AllianceBernstein LP launched AB NAV Lending with an anchor investment from insurance firm Equitable Holdings Inc. Athene is perhaps the most high-profile insurer to enter the market, gaining prominence after acquiring large portions of NAV loans that its parent Apollo arranged and syndicated for Masayoshi Son’s SoftBank Group Corp. and Chase Coleman’s Tiger Global Management. Athene’s firepower has given Apollo the ability to lead bigger loans, like the $1 billion NAV loan Warburg Pincus took out in December to pay down bank facilities involving an older fund. “These types of financings are very attractive to insurers,” said Leah Edelboim, a partner in the fund finance practice at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. “We are seeing more and more insurance providers either leading deals or coming into syndications.”Athene, created in part to help Apollo tap into the billions of dollars that baby boomers and other retirees are putting into annuities, will often acquire a chunk of each NAV loan that Apollo writes. The insurer invested roughly $767 million in NAV loans made to Tiger Global’s venture capital funds during the past two years, the filings show. And in March, Athene acquired a $93 million interest in a five-year NAV loan that Goldman Sachs Group Inc. put together for Vista Equity Partners Fund VII.Representatives for Apollo and Tiger Global declined to comment. A Goldman representative didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment.Rate-fueled BoomNAV loans were once a little-known niche within the fund finance world, where smaller private equity funds obtained loans by pledging their investments in closely held companies as collateral. The financing was only available from private credit firms such as Hark Capital and 17Capital or from a few global banks including Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase & Co.The NAV loan market began to draw more attention during the pandemic, when private equity firms turned to them for cash to tide over the companies they owned until the economy recovered. But it really took off as interest rates jumped and the IPO market floundered in 2022, shutting off traditional sources of liquidity for private equity funds. Now firms are using them to invest more in their portfolio companies, make additional acquisitions or — in a more controversial use of late — pay out distributions to investors.“Higher interest rates are making the exit markets very difficult for private equity sponsors,” said Doug Cruikshank, the founder of New York-based Hark Capital. “They need NAV loans more than ever as a bridge between the companies they have now and when they can sell them.”Even blue-chip firms are turning to NAV loans. Blackstone Inc. late last year said in regulatory filings that some of its funds “have entered into or are expected to enter into” NAV credit facilities, as well as subscription credit lines, a more common form of fund financing.MassMutual was an early entrant to the market among insurers. It established a direct private investments team in 2017 that provides proprietary secured loans backed by a range of assets to private capital managers and funds, a person familiar with the company said. MassMutual didn’t return calls or emails seeking comment.SoftBank DealApollo’s first big financing was a $4 billion NAV loan of sorts in December 2021 for SoftBank, secured by the $40 billion technology venture fund SoftBank Vision Fund 2. Following the SoftBank deal, Athene provided financing to other funds, including those run by Apollo as well as other money managers, regulatory filings show.Larger managers such as Blackstone have bigger funds, and that means they need bigger loans. Some NAV financings are approaching $2 billion and thus need multiple lenders.“No one can hold a loan for $1 billion to $2 billion” on their own, said Pierre-Antoine de Selancy, a co-founder and managing partner at London-based 17Capital.Apollo, like bank lenders in the NAV sector, typically limits the size of its loans to no more than 10% of the assets pledged as collateral. This not only protects against losses, but also helps the NAV loans obtain investment-grade credit ratings, a vital step for banks to syndicate the debt to insurers.The influx of insurer capital is prompting lenders to get credit ratings for NAV loans they plan to syndicate. The credit ratings not only give insurers insight into the riskiness of a NAV loan but also reduce the amount of regulatory capital they must set aside for the debt, said Gopal Narsimhamurthy, head of the fund ratings group at KBRA, the largest rater of NAV loans.
Archegos, como compañía, nunca apareció en las presentaciones regulatorias que revelan a los principales accionistas de acciones públicas. Además, Hwang usaba swaps, un tipo de derivado que le da a un inversionista exposición a las ganancias o pérdidas en un activo subyacente sin poseerlo directamente. Esto ocultó tanto su identidad como el tamaño de sus cargos. Incluso las empresas que financiaron sus inversiones no pudieron ver el panorama general hasta que fue demasiado tarde.
Me rindo. Sin manooooosssss!!!!!!!😜 ⁷
Cita de: tomasjos en Enero 06, 2024, 02:55:26 amY siguen en sus trece de no aceptar la realidad. Que se puede hacer con esta gente? Lean sus "argumentos" y díganme si esto no es chulería y negación de la realidsdhttps://www.eldebate.com/economia/20240105/expertos-contradicen-bruselas-aseguran-vivienda-espana-no-esta-sobrevalorada_164649.htmlTampoco hay que dar mucha importancia a esos artículos. Solo hay que ver el plantel de "ejpertos" consultados para ver el nivel de la prensa.La razon de ser del articulo es el titular, que es el meme que va directo al cerebro del lector; y si el lector es un pisitos, le produce tal dosis extra de dopamina, que ayuda a que el meme pase a formar parte de sus estructuras cerebrales y despues le veamos por todas las conversaciones de cuñaos dando clases magistrales a su aburrida audiencia sobre la ley-de-la-oferta-y-la-demands y resto de hijoputeces varias que El Propietariado utiliza para callar la boca a la disidencia. Estos titulares forman parte de la cuota de noticias triunfalistas de El Pisito que todo medio está obligado a lanzar todos los dias por los ordenadores y moviles de la soldadesca, que al fin y al cabo son los que están en la linea del frente aguantando la posición. No merece la pena perder tiempo con esos "ejpertos" prque la prensa del regimen los compra "a peseta el kilo" y los de este foro somos muy pocos. Hay que ir a por los directores de esos medios, que son los que se esconden detras de toda esta miriada de "ejpertos". Como la prensa siga bajando el nivel, cualquier dia vamos a ver a los chavalines de la corbata verde de las inmobiliarias de barrio produciendo titulares en medios tan prestigisios como El Debate.
A major banking executive apologized after facing sharp criticism for saying it's not that hard to save up and buy a houseSir Howard Davies was criticized for saying it's not that hard for people in the UK to buy a house.The Natwest chair has since apologized saying he didn't mean to "underplay" the challenges people face.House prices have increased in the UK, and saving for a deposit takes almost a decade now. A major British banking executive has apologized after saying in a radio interview that it isn't "difficult" to buy a house in the current environment.Sir Howard Davies, the chairman of British bank NatWest Group, spoke with the BBC Radio 4's Today program on Friday and made tone deaf comments about the current housing market. Presenter Amol Rajan asked the executive when it will be easier for people to get on the property ladder in the UK. "I don't think it's that difficult at the moment," Davies responded. "You have to save and that's the way it always used to be." Rajan remarked in response: "To buy a house in this country? Are we living in the same country or are you reporting from overseas?" Davies added: "I totally recognize that there are people who are finding it very difficult to start the process. They will have to save more but that is, I think, inherent in the change in the financial system as a result of the mistakes that were made in the last global financial crisis and we have to accept we're still living with that." Davies subsequently received significant criticism for his comments with the CEO of Generation Rent Ben Twomey saying: "What planet does he live on? We are in a cost-of-renting crisis that is making it incredibly hard for people to buy a home as we hand a third of our wages every month over to our landlord." Twomey also said: "Interest rates have increased but house prices have yet to correct, meaning we still need to save for a huge deposit, but also would need a high income to afford monthly mortgage repayments."Katy Eatenton, a mortgage and protection specialist at Lifetime Wealth Management said Davies is "totally out of touch with reality." Eatenton explained: "The cost of living is the highest it has been, rents are increasing year on year and house prices, interest rates and the lack of first-time buyer schemes are all adding to the difficulty in getting on the property ladder." Later Friday, Davies responded to the criticisms in a statement, apologizing and saying his comments came across differently to what he meant."Given recent rate movements by lenders there are some early green shoots in mortgage pricing and while funding remains strong, my comment was meant to reflect that in this context access to mortgages is less difficult than it has been." He added: "I fully realise it did not come across in that way for listeners and as I said on the programme, I do recognise how difficult it is for people buying a home and I did not intend to underplay the serious challenges they face. People have to save much more than they did in the past and that is tough for first time buyers."Saving for a mortgage deposit is becoming increasingly difficult in the UK with research from Generation Rent in 2023 showing that it takes almost a decade now to save for a deposit on a property. This is up from the average of 6.8 years in 2012. In London, it now takes an average of 18.3 years to save for a deposit, according to the research. One freelancer, Adam England, who lives in the UK and makes £3,000 a month, told Business Insider previously that he can't afford to save for a house because much of his income goes towards living costs. England pointed to the cost-of-living crisis and the increased price of houses, making it extremely difficult for young people to set aside some of their wages in savings.
@NickTimiraos Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan notes some concern about markets getting ahead of the Fed on rate cut expectations: “We can’t count on sustaining price stability if we don’t maintain sufficiently restrictive financial conditions.”
Cita de: R.G.C.I.M. en Enero 06, 2024, 13:30:30 pmMe rindo. Sin manooooosssss!!!!!!!😜 ⁷No se rinda tan cerca de la victoria .Disfrute mientras intenta lo imposible.Imagínese dentro de la Operación frankton.Un saludo
Short Sellers See Distress Emerging in Apartments as Borrowing Costs SurgeShort sellers hope to profit from bets against multifamilyApartments valued at $67.1 billion are potentially distressedSoaring rents and cheap funding made blocks of US rental apartments seem like a “can’t miss” investment during the pandemic. Developers piled in to take advantage by constructing millions of the multifamily units, while investors snapped up older complexes to renovate them.Since then, borrowing costs have surged, and now there are emerging signs that some borrowers will struggle to refinance, Fitch Ratings said on Thursday. Rents are stabilizing, landlords’ expenses have risen and competition has grown, which will cause the delinquency rate for the assets to double this year to 1.3%, exceeding the pandemic peak, according to the ratings company.The warnings come as more than $1 trillion of multifamily debt is due to mature through 2028, according to data compiled by Trepp, potentially leading to increased defaults and losses for banks and bondholders. While the problems are not seen as systemic, short sellers are moving in to try to profit from the emerging distress.“I expect a great deal of pain in multifamily as we adjust to a higher interest rate environment along with a lot more supply hitting the market in 2024,” said Daniel McNamara, founder of hedge fund Polpo Capital, which is betting against commercial mortgage bonds.McNamara’s short positions are focused on offices, which have been battered by the work-from-home trend, but the derivatives he uses for those bets sometimes have some exposure to apartment rentals.Viceroy Research, meanwhile, said in November that it was shorting Arbor Realty Trust Inc., a lender to US apartment landlords, arguing that the lender is burdened with distressed loans that were bundled into commercial real estate collateralized loan obligations. Arbor declined to comment. Multifamily assets valued at more than $67 billion are potentially distressed, the most of any property asset class, according to data compiled by MSCI Real Assets.“There were a few unprofessional people getting over their skis,” said Jim Costello, chief economist at the data provider, regarding borrowers. While stories about the problems those debtors run into will dominate headlines this year, current price declines are bringing values back to pre-pandemic trend levels, he said.Some companies are looking to reduce their exposure to the sector. Lennar Corp. is considering selling more than 11,000 apartments operated by a subsidiary, Bloomberg reported in December. Later that month, the homebuilder’s Chief Financial Officer Diane Bessette warned that its multifamily business is expected to lose about $25 million in the first quarter, more than double the loss in the previous three months. Lennar didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment.The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta cited high-end complexes as an area of distress in a November report, while its San Francisco counterpart found landlords were battling lower occupancy in some downtown high-rises. Some projects in the St. Louis Fed’s zone have already been canceled or delayed because of higher interest rates.Boise, Idaho, Phoenix and Austin are also among the markets seeing some signs of softening, said Alan Todd, a commercial mortgage-backed securities strategist at Bank of America Corp.Distress will be isolated to a handful of markets that grew most quickly in recent years, Todd said. Some borrowers will have to inject more equity to help pay off their old loan because of higher rates and lower cash flow growth.There are going to be pockets of stress in multifamily, said Chris Hentemann, chief investment officer and founder at 400 Capital Management, emphasizing that he doesn’t see the issues as systemic.“Anything that is hitting a maturity event or has a variable form of financing is going to be under some stress, especially if they cannot keep raising rents precipitously in line with the cost of debt.”
Citar“Anything that is hitting a maturity event or has a variable form of financing is going to be under some stress, especially if they cannot keep raising rents precipitously in line with the cost of debt.”
“Anything that is hitting a maturity event or has a variable form of financing is going to be under some stress, especially if they cannot keep raising rents precipitously in line with the cost of debt.”
Su historia empresarial recuerda bastante a la de los reyes inmobiliarios de la burbuja española del ladrillo. Un directivo ambicioso y carismático, con estrechos lazos con la política, que vive las mieles del éxito hasta que la presión de la deuda hace saltar por los aires todo su entramado corporativo. Es lo que le ha pasado a René Benko (1977), considerado uno de los nombres más poderosos del sector inmobiliario europeo, promotor y comprador de edificios icónicos, como el Chrysler de Nueva York o los grandes almacenes Selfridges de Londres....Los problemas de la compañía para hacer frente a su deuda habrían comenzado en 2020, con la pandemia de coronavirus, el pinchazo de los alquileres de oficinas con el teletrabajo, la posterior subida de los tipos de interés, así como la de los costes de los materiales de obra y la inflación, según Bloomberg. Esta agencia ha tenido acceso a la documentación de la declaración de insolvencia de las principales sociedades del grupo Signa.En ella, se cifran las exigencias de pasivo a corto plazo -de devolución de deuda en los próximos meses- en más de 5.000 millones de euros. Entre las entidades a las que debe dinero, gigantes financieros europeos como Julius Baer, ABN Amro o BNP Paribas, pero también fondos soberanos como el de Arabia Saudí, aunque no indica cifras concretas. Además, existirían numerosos préstamos intragrupo, entre las filiales, que según diferentes informaciones elevarían el endeudamiento por encima de los 10.000 millones.Ahora, el holding de Signa y las filiales en situación de insolvencia tienen por delante un periodo de reestructuración que puede prolongarse en el tiempo, porque según la legislación austriaca los equipos directivos pueden continuar y tienen hasta dos años para pagar a los acreedores el 30% de lo que se les adeuda. Para conseguirlo, tienen que lograr liquidez, por ejemplo, a través de la venta de activos. Uno de los que tiene colocado el cartel de 'se vende' es el edificio Chrysler de Nueva York, donde Signa comparte la propiedad con el promotor Aby Rosen y que adquirieron justo antes de la pandemia.