www.transicionestructural.NET es un nuevo foro, que a partir del 25/06/2012 se ha separado de su homónimo .COM. No se compartirán nuevos mensajes o usuarios a partir de dicho día.
0 Usuarios y 6 Visitantes están viendo este tema.
No habrá revolución ni cambio alguno sin organización.Cuando se acabe el Trabajo por demografia o balance de rentas negativo, se acabarán también la Empresa por falta de trabajadores o de consumidores.Si el problema está en la Organización (la del Estado), estás simplemente intuyendo que se está produciendo una disolución de la organización de nuestro nivel para dejar paso a la misma organización, pero operando en el nivel superior. De hecho, ese y no otro es el programa de la UE. Lo que no explicaron fue que suponía primero acabar con la organización del Trabajo y la de la Empresa (es decir, que hay 100 PME en lugar de 10 grandes es resultado del modelo de Estado de los 50-60, no de ninguna decisión Empresarial).Aparte, claro que sí se sabe cómo terminan las guerras : cuando sólo queda una organización. Que es la que reconstruye y dicta el narrativo a posteriori. Creo que es exactamente esa la función de la guerra. Lo que hacemos en Ucrania es coherente. Lo curioso es que vamos a perder esa guerra. Pero lo que nos importa, y ya se observa, es construir el narrativo a posteriori.Por eso digo que vamos directos a la distopía. Que es importante entender el mecanismo de relaciones a tres bandas Trabajo Empresa Estado. Y rectificar mientras estamos a tiempo de poder hacerlo.(Prohibir la venta del suelo)
https://reason.com/2024/02/13/new-york-new-york/CitarNew York, New YorkPlus: rent control behind financial problems at NYCB, public housing's corruption problem, and New York City's near-zero vacancy rate.(...) Before 2019, landlords could remove their units from rent stabilization when monthly rents went above $2,800 and the current tenant moved out—a policy called "vacancy decontrol." Landlords were also allowed to pass on the costs of building repairs to tenants and raise rents. In 2019, the New York Legislature amended the rent stabilization law to eliminate vacancy decontrol and limit the ability of landlords to pass on the costs of unit upgrades and building repairs to tenants.That means, today, landlords are only able to raise rents by the amount set by the Rent Guidelines Board, which consistently only allows rent increases well below the costs of inflation."What [lawmakers] were doing is eliminating the only mechanism that was allowing these buildings to operate financially. All these loans on these buildings are inverted," says Jay Martin, executive director of the Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP), a trade association of building owners.With the future potential rents at these buildings suddenly curtailed by regulation, the value of these buildings has dropped substantially.*CHIP released a report last week showing plummeting values of rent-stabilized buildings. Some two-thirds of rent-stabilized buildings are worth less than their valuations in 2018. Some individual buildings are selling for between 50 percent and 75 percent less than their last sale.NYCB lent a lot of money to building owners prior to these huge drops in valuation and is now stuck with underperforming loans and assets.Martin says many buildings are no longer able to operate profitably or finance needed repairs. Either government subsidies or changes to the state's rent stabilization law to entice private investment are needed to keep these buildings afloat. Some building owners are leasing out their entire buildings to non-profits. Some are talking about walking away from their buildings entirely.It's a remarkable situation indeed when residential real estate in one of the most expensive cities in the world can't turn a profit without government subsidies.In one sense, this is an example of rent control doing what rent control supporters want it to do. The 2019 regulatory regime is doing a pretty comprehensive job of keeping rents below market rates and preventing landlords from taking their properties off the market.But because the law can't also force the value of rent-stabilized buildings to stay the same or force investors to sink money into money-losing buildings, the capital needed to maintain these buildings is going elsewhere. Banks and building owners are suffering the consequences now. Soon enough, tenants in dilapidated, unprofitable units will too.(...)*https://static1.squarespace.com/static/62a76b5519c8823b588af21c/t/65c3bf83401dd736c487d236/1707327368252/CHIP+Disinvestment+Report+2-24.pdf
New York, New YorkPlus: rent control behind financial problems at NYCB, public housing's corruption problem, and New York City's near-zero vacancy rate.(...) Before 2019, landlords could remove their units from rent stabilization when monthly rents went above $2,800 and the current tenant moved out—a policy called "vacancy decontrol." Landlords were also allowed to pass on the costs of building repairs to tenants and raise rents. In 2019, the New York Legislature amended the rent stabilization law to eliminate vacancy decontrol and limit the ability of landlords to pass on the costs of unit upgrades and building repairs to tenants.That means, today, landlords are only able to raise rents by the amount set by the Rent Guidelines Board, which consistently only allows rent increases well below the costs of inflation."What [lawmakers] were doing is eliminating the only mechanism that was allowing these buildings to operate financially. All these loans on these buildings are inverted," says Jay Martin, executive director of the Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP), a trade association of building owners.With the future potential rents at these buildings suddenly curtailed by regulation, the value of these buildings has dropped substantially.*CHIP released a report last week showing plummeting values of rent-stabilized buildings. Some two-thirds of rent-stabilized buildings are worth less than their valuations in 2018. Some individual buildings are selling for between 50 percent and 75 percent less than their last sale.NYCB lent a lot of money to building owners prior to these huge drops in valuation and is now stuck with underperforming loans and assets.Martin says many buildings are no longer able to operate profitably or finance needed repairs. Either government subsidies or changes to the state's rent stabilization law to entice private investment are needed to keep these buildings afloat. Some building owners are leasing out their entire buildings to non-profits. Some are talking about walking away from their buildings entirely.It's a remarkable situation indeed when residential real estate in one of the most expensive cities in the world can't turn a profit without government subsidies.In one sense, this is an example of rent control doing what rent control supporters want it to do. The 2019 regulatory regime is doing a pretty comprehensive job of keeping rents below market rates and preventing landlords from taking their properties off the market.But because the law can't also force the value of rent-stabilized buildings to stay the same or force investors to sink money into money-losing buildings, the capital needed to maintain these buildings is going elsewhere. Banks and building owners are suffering the consequences now. Soon enough, tenants in dilapidated, unprofitable units will too.(...)