Los administradores de TransicionEstructural no se responsabilizan de las opiniones vertidas por los usuarios del foro. Cada usuario asume la responsabilidad de los comentarios publicados.
0 Usuarios y 3 Visitantes están viendo este tema.
[He retocado la redacción de...https://www.transicionestructural.net/index.php?topic=2608.msg230149#msg230149... para que quede clara la imbecilidad que significa que la inflación argentina es por la impresora —un país que imprime relativamente poco—, en lugar de por la lucha por la Renta. He observado que los economistas-cantinflas se ponen muy serios para decir que «no hay demanda de pesos argentinos». Y tú vas y te lo crees. Cuando son los argentinos pudientes —que ahorran en dólares— los que los quieren moneda nacional a paladas —valiendo una mierda— para pagar salarios e impuestos.
[...] Aprovecho para decir que la situación política en España es óptima para dar el Hostión-2025. Después de que la Inspección de Hacienda del Estado descubriera la facturación sanitaria falsa, la Sra. Ayuso ha quedado amortizada como activo electoral del PP. Fíjense cómo el PSOE se esperó a después de las elecciones para sacar el asunto. Al PSOE le interesa que esa manzana podrida siga corroyendo al PP, ahora con la ayudita del impresentable topo-rata primero. La tan votada —por obreros-propietarios resentidos echados al monte— da tumbos como el boxeador tramposo sonado que es.
US borrowing binge risks market strains, analysts warnFederal Reserve may be forced to end quantitative tightening early, as stock of Treasury bills forecast to soar above $6tnAnalysts warn that if the US floods the market with Treasury bills, it could jeopardise the Federal Reserve’s quantitative tightening © EPA-EFEThe US will be forced to fund a massive increase in its budget deficit with short-term debt, analysts have said, with consequences for money markets and the battle against inflation.The Congressional Budget Office, the independent fiscal watchdog, this week said aid packages for Ukraine and Israel would help push up the US deficit this fiscal year to $1.9tn — compared with its February prediction of $1.5tn.“We are spending money as a country like a drunken sailor on shore for the weekend,” said Ajay Rajadhyaksha, global chair of research at Barclays. The increase in the deficit has long alarmed fiscal hawks, who warn the US’s lack of discipline will inevitably push up borrowing costs and that neither President Joe Biden nor his Republican challenger Donald Trump have substantive plans to shore up the country’s finances.The more recent shift to short-term financing may also disrupt money markets and complicate the anti-inflation drive of the US Federal Reserve.Some of the expected increase in the deficit is because of student loan forgiveness, which is not expected to have an immediate effect on cash flows.But Jay Barry, co-head of interest rate strategy at JPMorgan, said the expanded deficit would require the US to issue an additional $150bn of debt in the three months before the fiscal year ends in September.He added he expected most of the funds to be raised through Treasury bills, short-term debt instruments whose maturity ranges from one day to a year.Such a move would increase the total outstanding stock of Treasury bills — unredeemed short-term US debt — from $5.7tn at the end of 2023 to an all-time high of $6.2tn by the end of this year.“It is likely that the share of Treasury bills as a share of total debt increases, which opens up the question of who is going to buy them,” said Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo. “This absolutely could strain funding markets.”The size of the Treasury market has quintupled since the financial crisis, in an indication of how much the US has turned to debt financing over the past 15 years.As the deficit has risen, the US Treasury has found it increasingly hard to finance via long-term debt without causing an uncomfortable rise in borrowing costs. It has boosted the share of short-term debt it issues — but analysts warned it risks hitting the limits of demand.Longer-dated Treasury auctions are at record sizes at some maturities, and questions about who will buy all the debt on offer have plagued economists and analysts for months.Money market funds — mutual funds that invest heavily in short-dated debt — remain big investors in Treasury bills.But worries about overall demand are greater, because the Fed, the largest owner of US Treasury debt, is pulling back from the market, fundamentally changing the balance between buyers and sellers of US bonds.Analysts warn that if the US floods the market with Treasury bills, it could jeopardise quantitative tightening, the Fed’s drive to shrink its balance sheet, which is one of the main struts of the central bank’s push against inflation.“The risk is QT is going to have to end sooner than expected,” said JPMorgan’s Barry. The Fed had to step into the markets during the so-called repo crisis of September 2019, when a dearth of buyers briefly sent overnight lending rates above 10 per cent.Rajadhyaksha at Barclays warned the US could again experience “a September 2019 moment”.
Cita de: tomasjos en Junio 21, 2024, 13:50:40 pmCita de: Urederra en Junio 21, 2024, 13:36:18 pmBarcelona anuncia que en 2029 no habrá viviendas de uso turísticoEl alcalde de Barcelona anuncia que bloquea la concesión de licencias de pisos turísticos y no renovará las existentes, de manera que en cinco años desapareceránhttps://www.elmundo.es/economia/2024/06/21/66756118fdddff6e4a8b45a3.html?intcmp=livefeed&catlivefeed=%C3%9Altima+horaUna buena noticia. Santiago también lo ha hecho y Málaga está en ello. Espero que pase en todos los sitios y se acabe está locura de los pisos turísticos, y que sea el detonante, junto con las zonas tensionadas, de la avalancha de ventas y desplome de precios de venta y alquiler.Veremos en qué queda y qué inventos se sacan de la manga para incumplir, pero al menos parece que por fin se están tomando medidas más allá de cuatro retoques tímidos. Esto tiene que ser así, a saco y sin la más mínima duda sobre la intención de las medidas, que es acabar con el dinero-sin-trabajar de un puñado de gente que nació en cierta época a costa del esfuerzo y conocimiento de todos los demás que les tienen que pagar su impuestito privado.
Cita de: Urederra en Junio 21, 2024, 13:36:18 pmBarcelona anuncia que en 2029 no habrá viviendas de uso turísticoEl alcalde de Barcelona anuncia que bloquea la concesión de licencias de pisos turísticos y no renovará las existentes, de manera que en cinco años desapareceránhttps://www.elmundo.es/economia/2024/06/21/66756118fdddff6e4a8b45a3.html?intcmp=livefeed&catlivefeed=%C3%9Altima+horaUna buena noticia. Santiago también lo ha hecho y Málaga está en ello. Espero que pase en todos los sitios y se acabe está locura de los pisos turísticos, y que sea el detonante, junto con las zonas tensionadas, de la avalancha de ventas y desplome de precios de venta y alquiler.
Barcelona anuncia que en 2029 no habrá viviendas de uso turísticoEl alcalde de Barcelona anuncia que bloquea la concesión de licencias de pisos turísticos y no renovará las existentes, de manera que en cinco años desapareceránhttps://www.elmundo.es/economia/2024/06/21/66756118fdddff6e4a8b45a3.html?intcmp=livefeed&catlivefeed=%C3%9Altima+hora
Boris Johnson: Nimbies pretend to care about architecture to block developments Mayor of London attacks homeowners who 'pretend' to care about architecture to stop developmenthttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/london-mayor-election/mayor-of-london/10984944/Boris-Johnson-Nimbies-pretend-to-care-about-architecture-to-block-developments.html“Nimbies in disguise” are dishonestly claiming to care about architecture when in reality they want to block any development, Boris Johnson has said.23 July 2014In a scathing assessment, the Mayor of London said homeowners “pretend” they care about new homes being affordable or well-designed, in fact they simply oppose new developments entirely.Mr Johnson has promised to increase house-building in the capital, and wants to see 45,000 new homes by 2018.However, he says he his efforts have been frustrated by residents opposed to any new development.There is a particularly bitter planning fight over plans to build 700 flats on the site of a Royal Mail sorting office at Mount Pleasant, North London. Planning opponents say the scheme is “bland” and too few of the homes are “affordable”.But Mr Johnson told the BBC: “Very often in London what you see is people objecting to a scheme purportedly because they say it fails such-and-such an architectural criteria, it’s not beautiful enough, or something like that. Or they say there isn’t enough affordable housing.“I think it is odd that people actually try to stop developments going ahead. I think of the amazing development at Deptford [south east London] – that’s been blocked for twenty years.“You have a coalition of people who pretend to be in favour of such-and-such a thing – better architecture or whatever – and what they want is no building in their area. You’ve got nimbies in disguise. That is very often the problem.”Mr Johnson said cautioned wealthy foreigners against treating London property as “bank accounts in the sky”, saying the market is not “a one way bet”.There are “signs of softening” at the top of the market, he said. The number of vacant properties in the capital is at its lowest level since the 1970s, he added.
https://www.lavanguardia.com/local/barcelona/20240621/9749899/barcelona-eliminara-todos-pisos-turisticos.htmlCitarBarcelona eliminará todos sus pisos turísticosEl alcalde Jaume Collboni anuncia que las 10.101 licencias de la ciudad se extinguirán en noviembre del 2028(...) El alcalde Collboni argumentó que el precio del alquiler en la ciudad se incrementó cerca de un 70% en los últimos diez años, y el de la compra en torno al 40, extremo que obliga al Ayuntamiento a tomar medidas drásticas para garantizar el acceso a la vivienda.“No podemos permitir que la mayor parte de la gente joven que quiera marcharse de su casa tenga que marcharse de Barcelona -abundó el alcalde-. Esta medida no cambiará la situación de un día para otro. Estos problemas requieren de tiempo. Pero con esta medida estamos marcando un punto de inflexión”Además, Collboni también anunció esta mañana que el Ayuntamiento modificará la controvertida medida que obliga a los constructores a destinar a vivienda social el 30% de cada promoción que levanten.El socialista argumentó que esta medida diseñada por el equipo de Ada Colau en el anterior mandato, en el 2018, apenas generó 98 viviendas asequibles, y que este dato obliga a su revisión. “Lo que planteamos es que los promotores puedan transferir estas viviendas protegidas a otros solares y también abrir la puerta a que sea un promotor social el encargado de ejecutar estas viviendas”.
Barcelona eliminará todos sus pisos turísticosEl alcalde Jaume Collboni anuncia que las 10.101 licencias de la ciudad se extinguirán en noviembre del 2028(...) El alcalde Collboni argumentó que el precio del alquiler en la ciudad se incrementó cerca de un 70% en los últimos diez años, y el de la compra en torno al 40, extremo que obliga al Ayuntamiento a tomar medidas drásticas para garantizar el acceso a la vivienda.“No podemos permitir que la mayor parte de la gente joven que quiera marcharse de su casa tenga que marcharse de Barcelona -abundó el alcalde-. Esta medida no cambiará la situación de un día para otro. Estos problemas requieren de tiempo. Pero con esta medida estamos marcando un punto de inflexión”Además, Collboni también anunció esta mañana que el Ayuntamiento modificará la controvertida medida que obliga a los constructores a destinar a vivienda social el 30% de cada promoción que levanten.El socialista argumentó que esta medida diseñada por el equipo de Ada Colau en el anterior mandato, en el 2018, apenas generó 98 viviendas asequibles, y que este dato obliga a su revisión. “Lo que planteamos es que los promotores puedan transferir estas viviendas protegidas a otros solares y también abrir la puerta a que sea un promotor social el encargado de ejecutar estas viviendas”.
At Blackstone’s $339 Billion Property Arm, the Honeymoon Is OverAs the cheap-money era fades into history, the world’s biggest real-estate investor is moving into riskier new terrain in the hunt for stellar returns. A QTS data center campus construction site in Litchfield Park, Arizona.Photographer: Ash Ponders/BloombergNadeem Meghji was on honeymoon in late 2022 when the biggest storm to have rocked Blackstone Inc.’s property business hit its peak.The private equity behemoth had just capped withdrawals from the Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust (BREIT), a fund at the vanguard of its money-spinning push to win the hearts of retail investors. As head of the firm’s US property division, Meghji was at the eye of the tempest — newlywed or not.From a lakeside resort on New Zealand’s South Island surrounded by snow-capped mountains he toiled through the night, helping broker a deal with the University of California to inject $4 billion into the fund as a show of confidence. Next morning he chatted with Blackstone President Jon Gray, another real-estate luminary who happened to be holidaying nearby.“I promised my wife that this would be the exception rather than the rule in our marriage,” Meghji recalls in an interview with Bloomberg.Whether he keeps that pledge isn’t entirely in his hands. Meghji has since then been put in charge of the firm’s entire $339 billion global property arm, the world’s biggest real-estate investor, alongside ex-Goldman Sachs Group Inc. staffer Kathleen McCarthy. With his industry reeling from higher-for-longer interest rates, the promotion couldn’t have come at a harder time.Kathleen McCarthy, cohead of Blackstone's property division.Photographer: Frederic J. Brown/AF/Getty ImagesBREIT’s situation has dominated headlines lately, including its sweetening of a student-dorm sale by offering financing support to the buyer. But the huge opportunistic real-estate funds with which Blackstone made its name, and which remain at the core of its business, are also facing their own epochal challenge. Awash with cheap money, these funds — and those of fellow private equity titans — conquered global property markets in past decades. Central bankers have demolished that era’s certainties.As McCarthy and Meghji begin to deploy $65 billion of dry powder on deals, an unmatched sum for this industry, they’re doing so in an environment where Blackstone’s No.1 advantage — its sheer size — no longer guarantees success.Blackstone made its first real-estate fortune by buying up distressed buildings and fixing them. Later it started using its ever-more massive cash piles, and close Wall Street ties, to make punts on enormous property portfolios safe in the knowledge that near-zero rates lifted all boats, even if some assets weren’t as seaworthy as others. The waters are far more treacherous now.If the winners of the last era were firms with capital-markets savvy and heft, then the victors today might be those with old-school property skills, ones who know how to spot a prize location and how to squeeze rents from it.“This isn’t a time to be a macro player, it’s a time to really understand the real estate,” says Dean Shapiro, global head of development at Oxford Properties, an arm of Canada’s OMERS pension fund, speaking generally about private equity’s tactics. “You have to understand the local market.”For their part, Blackstone’s leadership duo are optimistic after doing a blizzard of deals lately, though they acknowledge the need to tread carefully as rates stay high and political turmoil runs rampant. Looking at the real-estate crisis, Meghji says it’s a moment to “focus on fundamentals and look past the near-term noise and sentiment, which is in our view overly negative.”“We see the bad news as already being priced in,” McCarthy adds. “We see us moving past the peak of inflation; and the capital markets are recovering.”The darkest clouds are over US offices, prompting Blackstone to constantly talk up its lack of exposure to that market. But it made its name grabbing bargains in periods of maximum fear, and it’s toning down the anti-office rhetoric.“We’ll be very selective,” McCarthy says. “Buying cheap isn’t a strategy.”With two property mainstays, offices and shops, largely off the menu even as its coffers swell, Blackstone has switched attention to much less mature niches such as logistics, student housing and life-sciences sites. It says a collapse in construction work in these areas will restrict future supply, pushing up values of the assets it has been buying. Yet its recent march into the virgin territory of data centers means doing riskier building and development work itself.A QTS data center under construction in Phoenix. Blackstone bought QTS in 2021.Photographer: Ash Ponders/BloombergProperty investors will have to be “more selective and that will make it more difficult for private equity firms because they always want to deploy huge amounts of capital,” says Henning Koch, chief executive officer of Commerz Real AG. With real estate at a historic inflection point — imposed by higher rates and technological disruption — Blackstone’s ability to be both biggest beast and choosy deal picker is about to be tested to the extreme.“Where you invest matters,” says Ken Caplan, the previous Blackstone property boss who’s been promoted to co-chief investment officer, in an interview at the firm’s London office. It’s crucial to be “in the sectors and geographies with stronger underlying fundamentals and macro trends.”Big Was BeautifulBlackstone’s property roots go back to a few New York financiers who snapped up troubled assets and made a turn, but its real-estate arm’s modern guise is a global giant that employs thousands of asset managers and dozens of data scientists. While it scored some impressive wins from its big is beautiful strategy in recent years, repeating those feats won’t be easy.In the decade after the financial crisis, it became known for quickly assembling large “platforms” — essentially a property company owned by its funds — such as Logicor, a warehouse landlord it sold to China’s wealth fund for €12.25 billion ($13.1 billion). In 2022 it pulled off a €21 billion recapitalization of Mileway, another warehouse group, bringing in new money from sovereign funds in Abu Dhabi and Singapore plus a sizeable slug from BREIT.These funds, chasing any kind of yield in a negative-rate world, were happy to pay chunky premiums to buy into such platforms. It was a way to deploy hefty pots of capital into a granular asset class. At Mileway, Blackstone assembled 1,700 properties through 220 transactions, all done by a small London team.The conviction that tight supply and demand for warehouses close to population centers would turbocharge rents proved correct. “It’s much easier to invest with the wind at your back,” says Meghji.But it wasn’t just rising rents that enabled the firm’s monster returns.For four decades starting in 1981, the cost of government borrowing was driven relentlessly lower, providing rocket fuel to a real-estate boom. Commercial property values are derived both from how much rent a building brings in and the multiple of that rent an investor is willing to pay, a metric known as the yield. When sovereign-bond yields fell, property yields did the same as investors swallowed skinnier returns more broadly.The upshot: Real-estate values soared. Even if landlords did nothing to improve buildings or increase rent, their valuations rose. This was manna from heaven for debt-fueled buyers with capital-markets knowhow and deep pockets.Blackstone was no slouch. An investor letter seen by Bloomberg shows a European urban-logistics portfolio in which one of its funds invested €325 million was sold for €1.6 billion, and a UK portfolio on which it spent €108 million exited at a €631 million value. Those standouts more than made up for laggards such as a deal to buy homes from Spanish bank BBVA.Key to the success of Mileway and others was that private equity firms were winning all ways as rents rose and yields plunged. “Opportunistic investors could buy portfolios that had some good assets and some bad and just hope for yield compression,” says Koch, speaking generally about PE funds.With real-estate yields following interest rates and government bond yields much higher lately, that side of the trade has run out of road. Finding a source of expandable, bulletproof rents — the holy grail of this industry — is the optimal route to profit right now.“Anybody can go buy anything and benefit from broad market-yield compression and be made to look like a bit of a hero,” says Toby Courtauld, CEO of London office landlord Great Portland Estates Plc. “If you want to generate rent growth, you actually have to know what you’re doing.”Blackstone started cutting back on offices pre-WFH.Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/BloombergThis will mean picking or developing the best buildings, choosing the right location and creating places where people want to be. It’s the dirty work of managing real estate and it needs boots on the ground.“Being able to really operate well is going to be critical,” Caplan concurs.The rent grab is evident in Blackstone’s flurry of dealmaking this year, including a $10 billion purchase of Apartment Income REIT and the acquisition of Tricon Residential Inc., an owner of single-family rentals. Shorter lease durations in these markets and plunging construction should let it jack up rents.Future ShockIn autumn 2016, futurologist Ray Kurzweil warned a ballroom of real-estate executives gathered at the Westin Paris Vendome hotel that technological change was advancing exponentially. The implications on how and where humans lived, worked and shopped would be profound and those changes were going to start impacting the built environment more and more quickly, he said.Many present poured scorn on the idea, arguing that there would always be strong demand for space in top malls, for example. The wisdom of that rejection is reflected in the share price of Europe’s then biggest landlord, Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield. It was €240 a share at the time. Now it’s about €74.“Two core sectors of global institutional real estate have been turned upside down by technological change,” says Tim Leckie, a managing director at Panmure Gordon in London, referring to cratering demand for brick-and-mortar shops and office space.Blackstone-owned 130-134 New Bond Street.Photographer: Jose Sarmento Matos/BloombergBlackstone was nimbler than many in adjusting, pushing hard into healthcare, movie studios, logistics and other fresher fields. “When I started at Blackstone in 1997 we were predominantly investing in office buildings and hotels,” Caplan says. “Buy, fix, sell. When we went public back in 2007, we were about 60% traditional US office. Today that’s less than 2% of our global portfolio.”And yet the rise of e-commerce and WFH has left scars among the people who bought the offices and shops from private equity firms, and that could make things awkward as the latter search for future exits. Acquirers will be much warier of any other novel technology’s threat to large property bets. Might materials innovations suddenly change data centers, driverless cars shift ideal locations for logistics hubs or 3-D printing upend where manufacturing is done?“Secular trends driven by technology are propelling individual asset classes in a way we haven’t seen before,” says Meghji.Platform sales are already trickier because of a lack of ready buyers. In early 2020, before Covid upended property markets, Blackstone bought student-housing business IQ in the UK’s biggest real-estate deal. As it starts to ponder an exit, bankers say an initial public offering is likelier than a sale.“Our preference is for all-cash exits,” McCarthy says. “But if the public markets are valuing something more attractively, we’ll pursue that.”Investors have been reminded too of property’s illiquid nature, a fear magnified by rapid technology changes. At BREIT, redemption requests have consistently exceeded what it’s taking in each quarter since the end of 2022.IQ accommodation in London.Photographer: Jose Sarmento Matos/BloombergSuburban DramaEven though investors made a killing on real estate when money was pretty much free, the underlying perils were brutally laid bare by that era’s abrupt end. And Blackstone wasn’t immune. Some deals were exposed where it had failed to increase occupancy or drive rents higher.In spring 2023, a default was declared on a loan secured against a portfolio of Finnish properties owned by Blackstone. The sites were a sub-portfolio of Sponda Oy, a company the firm bought in 2018. Much of it was small, dated office buildings in suburban locations, Sponda’s lowest-quality assets.Blackstone had wanted to gradually sell the offices and repay the €531 million used to finance them, but Finland’s strict Covid rules and Russia’s Ukraine war made the timing bad. When it defaulted, about 45% of the portfolio was vacant.After Blackstone presented its proposal for a debt extension, some bondholders doubted whether it could do the hard yards needed to dispose of remaining properties at a lofty enough price, people with knowledge of the matter say. Eventually it persuaded creditors of a plan to make the properties sellable. It was given an extension until 2027, and a higher interest bill.A QTS data center under construction in Arizona.Photographer: Ash Ponders/BloombergWhile harsher monetary conditions create problems for Blackstone and peers, it isn’t holding off on spending. It’s doubling down on warehouses and rental housing. Its boldest move is data centers, a hot market amid the AI hype, and for that it’s shouldering a different type of risk: construction.Blackstone has refitted buildings or done limited works to add value to properties before, but this is a rare foray into the hazardous task of vast ground-up construction. It has to do this because the server farms of the future aren’t built yet, hence its purchase of data-center landlord and developer QTS.It also shows the pressure on private equity to chase higher returns from untested strategies when investors can get decent yields on US Treasuries. Blackstone is buying a site for £20 million ($25.5 million) in Northumberland, in northern England, to build a data center. It could ultimately entail investment of up to £10 billion. Never before has it risked that kind of capital spending.McCarthy says these risks are manageable because “you really don’t invest meaningful capital until you have a lease. They’re long-term in nature, with superhigh-quality, high-credit tenants.”Still, snagging prime tenants isn’t always a guarantee. Blackstone was trying to sell Cargo, a gleaming office block in London’s Canary Wharf that’s fully leased at stellar rents to topnotch clients. It’s halted the effort because sentiment about the neighborhood’s future is so poor — a stark illustration of why it zeroes in on sectors like data centers where demand is raging.Canary Wharf’s Cargo.Photographer: Jose Sarmento Matos/BloombergThe deeper question for Blackstone on offices is whether it wants to seize the greatest opportunity on distressed prices since Lehman Brothers’ collapse. But its executives have been so damning of the sector lately, unlike fierce rival Brookfield Corp., that changing course would be jarring. Meantime, it has been dipping a toe back into shops via luxury sites in Paris and London.And as it hunts for ways to put $65 billion to profitable use in a beleaguered market, it is holding onto the belief that pure firepower still gives it an edge. “We’ve been investing in real estate for 33 years,” McCarthy says. “We have huge advantages thanks to our scale, and unparalleled access to data.”
Aquí citan "primero de Económicas"... y luego proponen viejas soluciones, como las deducciones ........La única solución posibleÉl, precisamente, estudió Económicas y no entiende cómo el Gobierno no se da cuenta de que, si quiere solucionar el problema, solo existe un camino: "Lo que tienen que hacer es dar incentivos para que esas viviendas vuelvan al mercado y solo volverán si se les da seguridad y hay una desregulación, porque ahora mismo se trata a los propietarios como unos especuladores crueles y aquí, por ejemplo, hay muchos jubilados que alquilan pisos para completar su pensión".Lo que tienen que hacer es dar incentivos para que esas viviendas vuelvan al mercado y solo volverán si se les da seguridad y hay una desregulación, porque ahora mismo se trata a los propietarios como unos especuladores cruelesPor lo que respecta a los incentivos, hay expertos como José Ramón Zurdo, director de la Agencia Negociadora del Alquiler, que, además de esa desregulación y de acabar con la impunidad okupa, abogan por "rescatar las antiguas deducciones que había en el IRPF para fomentar la compra de primeras viviendas y de segundas, siempre que las compras de estas últimas se destinasen al alquiler".Una medida que también apoya Balbuena. "Claro que sí, esa podría ser otra opción: que se dieran incentivos fiscales para que se volviera a optar por el alquiler de larga duración, pero es que se han cargado el mercado, así que no va a ser ni fácil ni rápido", advierte el empresario.
Cita de: pollo en Junio 22, 2024, 12:25:24 pm[...] Que gane Ayuso (recordemos que está controlada remotamente por la Espe y MAR)¿Recordemos?Citar[...] con el discurso que tiene, El suyo. (De ella)Citar[...] para mí habla mucho más del problema que tienen los madrileños Autonomía. Lo que tenemos los madrileños es autonomía. Lo mismo que los demás, por cierto.Citar[...] y no hace sino dar la razón a ppcc.Ni hablar. Ni por el forro vamos a aceptar que una acusación (velada) es necesariamente un insulto. (Por ejemplo.)CitarA Ayuso la hacen ganar todos los que creen que no son meros trabajadores... Lo de siempre... los electores se equivocan. (Décadas ya... y ni por esas.)Citar[...] porque para ganarse la vida ya pueden parasitar (pisito mediante) a los que no tienen otra que ir a Madrid a trabajarEn vez de culpar a los caciques asturianos que no invierten en nada y que acaparan los pisos allá, la culpa va a ser de los emprendedores madrileños.Y claro que tienen dónde ir. Donde quieran. Lo que jode es que eligan libremente venir al infierno madrileño. (Como será el oasis asturiano.) Citar[...] y luego se compran un pisito en Asturias a subir los precios de aquí.Compramos donde nos sale de las pelotas... los precios ya los suben los caciques autóctonos. CitarApuesto los dos cojones y no los pierdo, que todo votante de Ayuso está en contra del teletrabajo.Tú apuesta... Citar El resto de la gente en Madrid que vota otras opciones o bien está encuadrada en la misma estafa parasitaria, pero sin la fantasía de poder falsolibertario (PSOE probablemente), o bien son los pringaos que tienen que sostener a todo el resto.No conozco a nadie que pudiendo, se haya quedado en Madrid. En el gremio en el que trabajo ahora, con gente de toda España, todo el mundo evita Madrid como la peste y es casi siempre la última opción (si quitamos otras opciones aún más caras, Baleares, Barcelona, etc.). Prácticamente nadie habla bien de Madrid hoy día, cosa que contrasta poderosamente con la situación de hace dos o tres décadas.El problema de todo este charlatanismo para tontos sobre el indivualismo extremo y el mercao, es que cuando caiga el castillo de naipes, lo cual acabará ocurriendo tarde o temprano por inviabilidad, va a haber mucha gente cabreada y con una deuda enorme, y serán votantes de un partido u otro. Y la culpa por supuesto será que no hay libertah, con dos cojones.La historia de la calle más 'sexy' de Madrid: el lugar donde todos quieren vivirhttps://www.elmundo.es/madrid/2024/06/22/66755d8ce85ecef55f8b4580.htmlEstéticamente sin competidores, señorial, clásica y de edificios espectaculares, esta vía de Chamberí esconde también algunos secretos CitarSi lo dice la mayor consultora inmobiliaria del mundo, Knight Frank, y lo recoge en un reportaje la revista Architectural Digest España, habrá que tomárselo en serio: la calle de Almagro es «donde están las casas más sexy de la capital», «donde todos quieren comprar su casa» y «estéticamente no tiene competidores: es clásica, señorial y sus edificios son espectaculares, el sueño europeo de muchos extranjeros que suspiran por techos altos y ascensores de rejilla». [ Sic. ]
[...] Que gane Ayuso (recordemos que está controlada remotamente por la Espe y MAR)
[...] con el discurso que tiene,
[...] para mí habla mucho más del problema que tienen los madrileños
[...] y no hace sino dar la razón a ppcc.
A Ayuso la hacen ganar todos los que creen que no son meros trabajadores...
[...] porque para ganarse la vida ya pueden parasitar (pisito mediante) a los que no tienen otra que ir a Madrid a trabajar
[...] y luego se compran un pisito en Asturias a subir los precios de aquí.
Apuesto los dos cojones y no los pierdo, que todo votante de Ayuso está en contra del teletrabajo.
El resto de la gente en Madrid que vota otras opciones o bien está encuadrada en la misma estafa parasitaria, pero sin la fantasía de poder falsolibertario (PSOE probablemente), o bien son los pringaos que tienen que sostener a todo el resto.No conozco a nadie que pudiendo, se haya quedado en Madrid. En el gremio en el que trabajo ahora, con gente de toda España, todo el mundo evita Madrid como la peste y es casi siempre la última opción (si quitamos otras opciones aún más caras, Baleares, Barcelona, etc.). Prácticamente nadie habla bien de Madrid hoy día, cosa que contrasta poderosamente con la situación de hace dos o tres décadas.El problema de todo este charlatanismo para tontos sobre el indivualismo extremo y el mercao, es que cuando caiga el castillo de naipes, lo cual acabará ocurriendo tarde o temprano por inviabilidad, va a haber mucha gente cabreada y con una deuda enorme, y serán votantes de un partido u otro. Y la culpa por supuesto será que no hay libertah, con dos cojones.
Si lo dice la mayor consultora inmobiliaria del mundo, Knight Frank, y lo recoge en un reportaje la revista Architectural Digest España, habrá que tomárselo en serio: la calle de Almagro es «donde están las casas más sexy de la capital», «donde todos quieren comprar su casa» y «estéticamente no tiene competidores: es clásica, señorial y sus edificios son espectaculares, el sueño europeo de muchos extranjeros que suspiran por techos altos y ascensores de rejilla».