Re:PPCC: Pisitófilos Creditófagos. Invierno 2025

[Derby]

https://www.reuters.com/markets/china-says-more-spanish-firms-welcome-tap-its-market-2025-02-15/

China says more Spanish firms welcome to tap its market

BEIJING, Feb 15 (Reuters) - China said on Saturday it welcomes more Spanish companies to tap into and share opportunities in its large market, as well as China's economic transformation and development.

More Spanish firm are also welcome to jointly build growth points for cooperation such as in the digital economy and artificial intelligence, Foreign Minister Wang Yi told his Spanish counterpart Jose Manuel Albares on Friday on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference, the foreign ministry said.

"China and Spain should work together to uphold multilateralism, promote democratisation in international relations, build broad international consensus and advance equal and orderly multipolarisation," Wang said.

[pollo]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-14/silicon-valley-unicorn-startups-are-desperate-for-cash

The Unicorn Boom Is Over, and Startups Are Getting Desperate

The billion-dollar startup bubble is deflating, and more than $1 trillion in value is locked up in companies with dwindling prospects.


Illustration: Sophi Gullbrants for Bloomberg Businessweek

As hard as it is to remember, there were buzzy startups in Silicon Valley before the tech world became solely fixated on artificial intelligence. By the time the Covid-era tech boom crested in 2021, well over 1,000 venture capital-backed startups had reached valuations above $1 billion, including fake meat purveyor Impossible Foods Inc., home maintenance marketplace Thumbtack and online-class platform MasterClass. Then came a squeeze sparked by rising interest rates, a slowing initial public offering market and the feeling that any startup not focused on AI was yesterday’s news.


Packages of Impossible Burger plant-based meat are displayed for sale during the Impossible Foods grocery store product introduction in Los Angeles in 2019.Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg

A reckoning that has been looming for years is becoming painfully tangible. In 2021 more than 354 companies received billion-dollar valuations, thus achieving unicorn status. Only six of them have since held IPOs, says Ilya Strebulaev, a professor at Stanford Graduate School of Business. Four others have gone public through SPACs, and another 10 have been acquired, several for less than $1 billion. Others, such as the indoor farming company Bowery Farming and AI health-care startup Forward Health, have gone under. Convoy, the freight business valued at $3.8 billion in 2022, collapsed the following year; the supply chain startup Flexport bought its assets for scraps.

Some startups feel like the “rug has been pulled out from under them,” says Sam Angus, a partner at the law firm Fenwick & West. “The fundraising reality has shifted.”

Welcome to the era of the zombie unicorn. There are a record 1,200 venture-backed unicorns that have yet to go public or get acquired, according to CB Insights, a researcher that tracks the venture capital industry. Startups that raised large sums of money are beginning to take desperate measures. Startups in later stages are in a particularly difficult position, because they generally need more money to operate—and the investors who’d write checks at billion-dollar-plus valuations have gotten more selective. For some, accepting unfavorable fundraising terms or selling at a steep discount are the only ways to avoid collapsing completely, leaving behind nothing but a unicorpse.

The fundraising market for startups began to sour in 2022 when, among other things, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates seven times after a decade of historically cheap money. These rate increases led to cost-cutting and industrywide layoffs, a trend that peaked in the first quarter of 2023, according to data provider Statista. Some companies that had been focused on growth shifted their goal to near-term profitability to reduce their reliance on venture capital.



Many startups, though, were built to chase growth with little concern for near-term profitability in their early years, assuming they could continue fundraising at increasing valuations. In many cases, that formula no longer works. Fewer than 30% of the unicorns from 2021 have raised financing in the past three years, according to data provided by Carta Inc., a financial technology company working with startups. Of those, almost half have done so-called down rounds, where investors value their companies at lower levels than they’d received in the past.

Celebrity video greeting service Cameo, for example, once had a valuation of $1 billion, but it raised money last year at a 90% discount, according to a person familiar with the matter who asked not to be named when discussing confidential information. Financial tech company Ramp has raised two sizable rounds since early 2022 at valuations below the $8 billion it got three years ago.

In the best-case scenarios, startups can use capital from down rounds to recover their footing.
Contractor software business ServiceTitan Inc., for example, raised money with unfavorable financial terms in 2022, only to exceed that value when it went public in 2024. It now has a market cap of $9.4 billion, in line with its peak private valuation of $9.5 billion in 2021.

But job cuts and down rounds can also kick off a vicious cycle. Startups are generally selling investors on stories about momentum, which becomes harder to do once they’ve decided to trade their ambition for fiscal discipline. For employees, a major financial upside of a startup gig is the chance to earn equity; once a company’s value starts dropping, workers with other options tend to start leaving.

Startups are taking a range of steps to adjust to their circumstances. Those that are in decent shape can opt to classify new fundraising as a continuation of a previous funding round, sidestepping the uncomfortable reality that their valuation is not growing. Given the environment, such flat rounds are widely seen as a success.



Other startups have to take deals that are unfavorable in ways that extend beyond lower valuations. This can mean changes to ownership structure, including deals requiring previous investors to participate or lose their ownership stake. These so-called pay-to-play deals can be unpopular for those being forced to re-up, for obvious reasons; last year Ryan Breslow, co-founder of payments startup Bolt, attempted to raise this type of financing round but was thwarted by objections from large shareholders.

Doubling down on a company whose prospects are dwindling, of course, is often a bad bet. The digital pharmacy Truepill was acquired after a pay-to-play round, but for only about a third of its value in 2021, according to PitchBook Data. Some investors regard deals with such bad terms as a sign it’s time to move on. “If the company has to go through one of these, it’s probably toast anyway,” says Jeff Clavier, founder and managing partner at Uncork Capital.

Deep-pocketed investment companies, including private equity firms, may buy some of these slow-growing startups. But businesses are simply “not going to fetch the type of valuations investors were giving them back in 2021,” says Chelsea Stoner, general partner at Battery Ventures, which invests in and acquires startups.

The remaining optimists can hope that something will spark a new round of techno-enthusiasm, or that a Lina Khan-less Trump administration will goose the acquisition and IPO markets. But Greg Martin, founder and managing director at Archer Venture Capital, says that for many unicorns the only—albeit unlikely—hope is for the market to go crazy again. “Unless we have another irrational valuation environment created by zero interest rates” like we had in the pandemic, he says, many of these zombie unicorns are “going to wind up in the graveyard.”

Ojalá. Y que sea pronto. En gran medida este tipo de mierdiempresas vendeburras, que sólo aspiran a venderse a alguien con mucha pasta que les quite el marrón de encima, y que promueven un estilo de funcionamiento y de vida absolutamente tóxico, son el instrumento que tienen los otros vendeburras para justificar todo el chiringuito de tontería financiera. A los creadores de estas "start-up" se les pone socialmente (especialmente en los medios) como ejemplos y triunfadores y eso está haciendo mucho daño.

Uno de los mayores problemas del popular-capitalismo es ese, se está admirando a gente que no es admirable en absoluto.

Los casos más llamativos son el de Juicero (si no lo conocéis buscadlo por Google porque es de comedia, si no fuera por la cantidad de pasta que se himbirtió ahí) o el de la vendeburras patológica (y que desde la cárcel sigue insistiendo en que ella sigue con sus proyectos) de Elizabeth Holmes, que hasta que no se le destapó el chiringuito (que a cualquiera con un poco de cultura le apestaba a tongo) era la segunda encarnación de Jesucristo en almíbar.

[Benzino Napaloni]

Ojalá. Y que sea pronto. En gran medida este tipo de mierdiempresas vendeburras, que sólo aspiran a venderse a alguien con mucha pasta que les quite el marrón de encima, y que promueven un estilo de funcionamiento y de vida absolutamente tóxico, son el instrumento que tienen los otros vendeburras para justificar todo el chiringuito de tontería financiera. A los creadores de estas "start-up" se les pone socialmente (especialmente en los medios) como ejemplos y triunfadores y eso está haciendo mucho daño.

Uno de los mayores problemas del popular-capitalismo es ese, se está admirando a gente que no es admirable en absoluto.

Los casos más llamativos son el de Juicero (si no lo conocéis buscadlo por Google porque es de comedia, si no fuera por la cantidad de pasta que se himbirtió ahí) o el de la vendeburras patológica (y que desde la cárcel sigue insistiendo en que ella sigue con sus proyectos) de Elizabeth Holmes, que hasta que no se le destapó el chiringuito (que a cualquiera con un poco de cultura le apestaba a tongo) era la segunda encarnación de Jesucristo en almíbar.

Una lectura rápida de domingo para quien no conozca el caso de Juicero, escrito con sorna y explicado poco menos que con marionetas:

https://hipertextual.com/2017/09/origen-caida-juicero

Un puñetero exprimidor de bolsitas no podía costar ni 700 ni 380 dólares.

Lo de Elizabeth Holmes ya sí que fue una estafa a lo grande. Si tienes un poco de cabeza sabes que hasta alguien podrido de dinero tiene mejores usos para la pasta que soltar 700 dólares por un simple exprimidor de zumos. La idea que tuvo la Holmes en sí no era mala. La tipa le tenía pavor a las agujas y pensó en hacer un sistema de analíticas de sangre con una simple gota de sangre.

Eso podía haber dado mucho dinero, y por eso captó tanta inversión. El problema es que con la tecnología disponible ese resultado es inalcanzable. La Holmes despedía por sistema a cualquiera que en la empresa le decía que, con suerte, antes de diez años no se alcanzaría ese nivel. Su peor error fue caer en el 'fake it till you make it'. Para quien no conozca este chascarrillo, viene a significar que mentir sobre el progreso que llevas está justificado porque al final llegarás al éxito. La tipa hacía visitas organizadas, y a los incautos inversores les hacía demostraciones con su propia sangre... que mientras se alargaba la visita se llevaban las muestras corriendo a laboratorios corrientes.

El problema de tirarse pedos continuamente es que tarde o temprano alguien los olerá. La mierda huele. La Holmes tenía en nómina a uno de los abogados más cabrones y agresivos de EEUU... pero toparon con un periodista aún más cabrón. Efecto Streisand: si éste se ha puesto tan furioso, es que cuate, aquí hay tomate. Se empezó a tirar del hilo, y se llegó al ovillo. Holmes está en la cárcel para una buena temporada por fraude, y su reputación está hecha trizas.


En España tenemos el caso de Holaluz. La última ocurrencia de su directora ha sido ir a vender su relato al Congreso de los Diputados mientras tiene a la plantilla en pie de guerra y con la empresa a punto de pinchar.


El problema de estos vendeburras es que prometen lo que en el fondo todos anhelamos: atajos. Respuestas fáciles a problemas complejos. Eliminar el tener que esforzarse. Pero eso no existe. El progreso sí existe, pero es muy lento, muy costoso, y hay que fracasar muchas veces antes del éxito, que pocas veces se tiene. El mismo Edison fracasó muchas veces antes de inventar la bombilla eléctrica.

[sudden and sharp]

Que las ramas... no te impidan ver el bosque.    



--------
$167,800.20

[sudden and sharp]

EURUSD.[14.02.2025] == 1,0498







---------
Son 159840,16 €.

[sudden and sharp]

-----
Es Bill... Murray.   

[Derby]

https://www.ft.com/content/10834f55-5b2a-4d97-9156-e714ce938269

Europe scrambles to respond as US and Russia prepare for Ukraine peace talks


France to host emergency meeting of heads of state and government as Washington and Moscow start negotiations

Western capitals are bracing for a potentially decisive week for European security, as the US and Russia begin talks to end the war in Ukraine and European leaders hold an emergency meeting to respond to the fast-moving negotiations taking place without them.

Europe’s most powerful leaders will gather in Paris on Monday for crisis talks on Ukraine and the future of European defence, sparked by Donald Trump’s decision to open peace talks with Russia. Those talks will formally begin in Saudi Arabia this week when Trump’s top diplomat Marco Rubio sits down with Russia’s Sergei Lavrov.

The Rubio-Lavrov meeting aims to lay the groundwork for Trump to meet Vladimir Putin, less than a week after the US leader shocked European capitals by agreeing with his Russian counterpart to start peace talks.

It will underscore the Europeans’ lack of input into negotiations that could ultimately reshape the continent’s security architecture.

“This is the beginning of the beginning. Things are definitely moving,” Alexander Stubb, Finland’s president, told the Financial Times. “Are Europe’s tectonic plates shifting?”


US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock at the Munich Security Conference © Peter Kneffel/Reuters

Referring to the date of Russia’s full-scale invasion, he added: “I think the world order started to shift on the 24th of February 2022, and we are now seeing the direction in which it might be going.”

Leaders including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Polish Premier Donald Tusk and the heads of EU institutions and Nato will huddle in Paris tomorrow at the invitation of President Emmanuel Macron.

They will discuss concrete plans aiming to safeguard European defence regardless of future US engagement, said officials briefed on the preparations, along with how best to support Ukraine and strengthen their negotiating position.

Starmer said it was a “once-in-a-generation moment for our national security where we engage with the reality of the world today”.

“It’s insane how fast this is moving,” said a western official briefed on the talks. “All [Europe] must do is give Ukraine as much as possible so that it can better say ‘no’ to things rammed down its throat [by the US and Russia].”


The Rubio-Lavrov meeting aims to lay the groundwork for a meeting between Vladimir Putin, left, and Donald Trump, seen here at the Hamburg G20 summit in 2017 © Evan Vucci/AP

Dmitry Peskov, Putin’s spokesman, said Trump’s decision to open talks was a “powerful signal that we will try to solve problems through dialogue and talk about peace rather than war,” in comments broadcast by state TV on Sunday.

The European leaders in Paris will discuss ideas including a possible deployment of European troops to Ukraine that would be stationed behind, not on, a future ceasefire line, as a “reassurance force”, said two officials.

But there is uncertainty over what role the US would play in potentially guaranteeing the security of any Nato forces in Ukraine. Trump’s team has ruled out deploying American troops to Ukraine, but European officials say the US has not excluded the possibility of providing external support to any deployment by Nato allies.

Many European governments are also uneasy about responding to a US request this week for specific details about weaponry, money and peacekeeping troops that they would be prepared to send to post-conflict Ukraine, according to multiple officials briefed on the discussions between capitals.

“The general feeling is that this is a good exercise in terms of thinking about what each can offer, but that the response to the US should be collective,” said one of the officials.

Stubb said: “I hope that whatever comes out of Paris is something which is appealing to the Americans so we can have more skin in the game.”

European leaders and diplomats spent much of their time at the Munich Security Conference over the weekend trying to parse the roles of the various members of Trump’s negotiating team, and how they might ultimately shape the president’s approach.

One senior European official said there was “95 per cent agreement” with Keith Kellogg, the 80-year-old retired general appointed as Trump’s Ukraine envoy, who has described Russia as “the enemy”.

But the official cautioned that the views of Kellogg, who was not named as a member of Trump’s four-man negotiating team, did not necessarily chime with those of Rubio, for example, “who might not see it the same way”.

In a meeting of G7 foreign ministers at Munich, Rubio was much less forthcoming with his views on Ukraine, said three people briefed on the discussions. Two said he noted that the talks with Lavrov would focus on logistics and planning for a Putin-Trump meeting, and would not go into details of negotiating positions.

“With the previous administration [under Joe Biden] there was no dialogue, just war without end,” Peskov said on Sunday. Trump’s stance “should be more impressive for any right-minded person or state”, he added.

Peskov also said Russia would “defend its interests so as not to be seduced by any false promises” during talks with the US.

[Derby]

https://www.lavanguardia.com/local/barcelona/20250216/10386316/subida-precio-alquileres-pone-jaque-bares-restaurantes.html

La subida del precio de los alquileres pone en jaque a bares y restaurantes
Algunos establecimientos se ven abocados al cierre ante el incremento de las rentas


La Madurada Petit Versailles, abierto hace unos días en el espacio que hasta hace poco ocupaba el centenario bar Versalles Llibert Teixidó

“Bar-restaurante en el Raval. 150 m2. Traspaso de 1.600.000 euros. 6.000 euros de alquiler al mes”. “Negocio en el Gòtic. 95m2. Traspaso de 650.0000 euros. 9.000 euros de alquiler al mes”… Son los primeros anuncios que aparecen en Idealista y que permiten hacerse una idea de cómo está afectando a los restauradores el panorama inmobiliario que vive en estos momentos Barcelona. Las cifras anteriormente citadas ya responden por sí solas, aunque no sorprenden teniendo en cuenta que en los últimos meses, el propio Ayuntamiento buscaba cuatro inquilinos que ocuparan una plaza en el Balcó Gastronòmic del Port Olímpic a un precio de 43.000 euros mensuales por local. O que algunos restaurantes centenarios, como el bar Versalles de Sant Andreu, reabierto ahora como brasería con el nombre de La Madurada Petit Versailles, se vieron obligados a echar la persiana el año pasado al ascender su renta a 10.000 euros mensuales. Incluso en Sant Cugat un establecimiento de una conocida cadena rápida de sándwiches cerró por el incremento en el precio del local comercial donde estaban ubicados.

Según datos del Observatorio de la Agencia de Desarrollo Económico del Área Metropolitana de Barcelona (AMB), la tendencia es que el precio de los alquileres comerciales continúe aumentando. Si en 2022 y 2023, el precio del alquiler medio por metro cuadrado era de 12,73 y 12,83 euros, respectivamente, en 2024 se situó entorno a los 13,81 euros.



Estos datos contrastan con los del número de locales disponibles para alquilar, en descenso. En 2023 había 28.012 espacios disponibles y en 2024 la cifra bajó a 23.686. ¿Los barrios más caros? Corona el ránking el Gòtic (22,16 euros por m2en 2024) seguido por la Barceloneta (22,06) y el Raval (20,00), precios en todo caso inferiores a los encontrados en algunas ofertas de Idealista.(...)

[Cadavre Exquis]

VisualEconomik | ¿Por qué el COLAPSO demográfico será la PEOR CRISIS de la humanidad? - VisualEconomik

Saludos.

[Cadavre Exquis]

Amazon Tests Robots For Automating Fulfillment Centers
Posted by EditorDavid on Sunday February 16, 2025 @10:34AM from the wild-robots dept.

Yahoo Finance shares an interesting prediction. Amazon has an "under-the-radar robot push" that "could boost its profit margins big-time, Morgan Stanley managing director Brian Nowak said."

Nowak said Amazon has quietly developed six significant next-generation fulfillment centers in the past three years that bring automation front and center... Amazon now has industrial robots that can increase efficiencies across the storage, inventory management, pick and packing, and sorting order fulfillment processes.

Fulfillment costs make up about 20% of Amazon's retail revenue, so he reasoned that automation could have a significant impact on long-term operating profit potential. Nowak says if 30% to 40% of Amazon's US units were fulfilled through next-generation robotics-enabled warehouses by 2030, it could lead to $10 billion-plus of savings... The investments in robots may already be paying off. Amazon's North America retail operating margins on a trailing 12-month basis have risen for five straight quarters. North America operating margins improved to 6.2% from 4.6% a year ago.

Nowak made the remarks on a Yahoo Finance podcast (at the top of their article) after touring one of Amazon's robot-enhanced sites in Louisiana. He believes robotics can drive down Amazon's costs compared to other retailers like Target (which he sees as lagging behind Amazon on robotics).

Meanwhile workers at an Amazon facility in North Carolina held a vote Saturday on whether to unionize. But roughly 75% of the workers voted against unionization.

Saludos.

[Derby]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-15/russia-ukraine-war-trump-rushes-toward-a-deal-with-putin-as-europe-left-in-dust

Trump Is Rushing Toward a Deal With Putin, Leaving Europe in the Dust

JD Vance’s broadside in Munich shocked European leaders
European powers are struggling to forge a response to Trump

(...)US officials told some Europeans in Munich that they believe America and China are the two big powers in discussions over Ukraine, even though the war is in the EU’s backyard, one European official said. The US will keep the Europeans abreast on progress but they’re not seen as significant players.

One veteran official said that Vance’s attack during his debut abroad was a watershed moment because it was such a fundamental attack on Europe’s values. It didn’t matter that European nations were dependent on the US for security when they shared the same basic principles, the official said. Without that common understanding, liberal democracy in Europe is at risk.

Europe now find itself in a desperate race to agree on plans for Ukraine’s security in the event of a peace deal with Trump already rushing into negotiations with Russia. The US president is planning to see Vladimir Putin as soon as this month.

The fear for many officials gathered for this year’s conference is that by dialing back support for Ukraine, Trump is inviting Putin to probe NATO’s willingness to defend the alliance’s eastern borders.

“If Putin continues, there will be a NATO test,” Tsahkna said.

Over the years there has been a lot of talk about the need for a common defense strategy. Macron was among the most vocal about the need to ramp up European capabilities but that never went far. Germany remained stubbornly opposed to joint borrowing with European defense bonds, the key step required to unleash defense spending to the tune of trillions.


JD Vance, fourth from right, meets with Volodymyr Zelenskiy, fourth from left, meet on the sidelines of the 61st Munich Security Conference in Munich, Germany, on Feb. 14.Photographer: Tobias Schwarz/AFP/Getty Images

A day after Vance’s address, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy spelled it out when describing his discussions with Trump about US plans for ending the war: “Not once did he mention that America needs Europe at that table.”

“That says a lot,” Zelenskiy noted on Saturday. “The old days are over – when America supported Europe just because it always had.”

The challenge for Europe goes deeper than a future Russian threat. In the here and now, Europe can’t afford to be sidelined from the conversations that will change the way the world works.

Multilateral forums like the Group of Seven and the Group of 20 are other places where its voice is heard. But if Trump decides they are not worth going to — a possibility officials are taking seriously — then their influence will be diminished even further.

That disrespect was tangible in the US dealings with both the UK and Ukraine this week.

After David Lammy’s meeting with Vance, the UK Foreign Secretary told reporters that the conversation had gone very well. Hours later the vice president was lambasting the British state for restricting protests outside abortion clinics.

In all this, the US was trying to ram through a one-sided deal to secure access to Ukraine’s natural resources after the war, according to two people familiar with the discussions. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent presented the terms to Ukrainian officials in Kyiv earlier in the week and Vance’s team in Munich were pressuring the Ukrainians to sign, the people said.

(...) The crunch point could come within a few months, according to one European who speaks to both Zelenskiy and the Trump team.

Russia has prepared for this moment, assembling already its cast of top-tier negotiators. Europeans are worried that the US has made too many concessions already and is eager to declare the problem solved, leaving them with the fallout.

The challenge is that the EU is good at negotiating when everyone plays by the same rules. In the free-for-all that Trump has set off, the EU is lost, because its leaders hands are tied.

Multiple officials in Munich said allies needed to agree on security guarantees among themselves before talks with Putin, but Trump is moving on a different timeframe.

Sensing the dangers ahead, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk implored the bloc to come up with a plan now.



In a week where the wheels of history appeared to turn with potentially massive consequences, it’s unclear whether everyone on the continent grasps the enormity of the stakes and the need to deal with reality as it is.

“There are only two things that motivate people to act: sex and the fear of death,” Tsahkna said. “The fear of death - do we have enough of it in Europe?”

[asustadísimos]

MILEI, ESTAFADOR.—

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHuzRVgCh6o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zs6pJBu7NVM

¡No damos abasto con eventos supersueltadesamparistas en este histórico febrero de 2025!

P. S.: No vamos nada desencaminados cuando decimos que los dos grandes monitores de la Suelta & Desamparo 2025 son Ucrania y las cripto.

[senslev]

The Meaning of Cycles and Beyond | Martin Armstrong Feb. 15, 2025

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAoQyya0HzE

Añado esto:

https://elpais.com/ideas/2025-02-15/hasta-que-caiga-el-meteorito-en-2032.html

Juas.

[sudden and sharp]

[...] P. S.: No vamos nada desencaminados cuando decimos que los dos grandes monitores de la Suelta & Desamparo 2025 son Ucrania y las cripto.

Ya lo creo yo que sí.

Bringing the Magazine Back with More Class

Somkuti leaned back, weighing the significance of the question as I asked about Cohen’s interest in Playboy. “Playboy has always been a cultural symbol, but in recent years, its identity has been in flux,” he admitted. “If Cohen is serious about reviving the magazine as a monthly publication, it would mark a return to the brand’s roots—high-class, sophisticated, and deeply cultural.”

Playboy was never just about risqué imagery; it was a publication that featured interviews with some of the greatest minds, from Malcolm X to Steve Jobs. “If Cohen wants to bring it back with more class, it could signal a shift toward premium content—think intellectual essays, exclusive interviews, and high-fashion photography,” Somkuti suggested.

The Meme King Looks To Save Another Dying Company





https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1iqx3om/the_meme_king_looks_to_save_another_dying_company/

https://medium.com/@KGreen_Julius/a-short-sit-down-with-andras-somkuti-of-byborg-enterprises-on-ryan-cohens-vision-for-playboy-fbf257c6cfc5








---------------


No parece nada fácil pronunciar los guiones... digo, leer entre líneas.

[sudden and sharp]

Un català guanyant en el Falla... ¿?



Chirigota, Comparsa Los calaíta (fuimos a por tabaco) una chirigota de toda la vida - Cuartos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcocRHC4J0I